Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1609:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n9csp2494444pja; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvI6y68DzunIAXaVE3CFO1tvNTRdueN8jRJdvmIlHqfY0d+yEJpCw9UL/092OCU4PLH3hvJ X-Received: by 2002:aca:1c02:: with SMTP id c2mr1576746oic.125.1585265519547; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585265519; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kaQh0MJNwTK/TltADbM5YcmAABXUZqJSnvS91d1g/CUwJ1Y1bJ+wbx6ZIZo9QMnzi6 CNusy0U0PEynmdgTvnRmfn4FAQSJ4Ewf2Dy4LqdcHAgu82SYLlaltnaNHlWQ85KSbbak bZVYmfM7Ty2auFXuoXE5tfAzsnrt//6oQuMb1s79oHUKLYH0+IV7isd8eiYdh3L+iybA iyWrlL1cy4hfM533vm3LF3ZyWMRBCS0XvsSA18F5wqC5LNVuSP1vlKkSFR25mhFY4xSC UdAMZaBkdTy3A665vwOl3heKMejquQFVf3gEMNKw79emDckmNMlyN3XZhlKhdnfE8KAj h7nw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=USVclo75MbQofynQvz6ob1KqtGfrfKPo3JVhLDXPhMA=; b=ElDeKg7kAoe6ucmhR706bC3ztGRdWBzYkY8dw0ImrOgGkSwstJn7u/VONcb18fhIv1 HQfRmJrso0GaEL7uzXPTpXG+e3I6I85iTKHyE5DX8R8TheJmA/hdoDolqQHJU+lU1PRb t4SHNCPWVVNnVB9K78sWUFerWT0SlIdwrg2/EoZejOhrpKYSMrx/ZHSrxbg0YO02BaSe /z/5CBtdU2i+5B5t8JylOweMuZ9ZAMUkvb8vLainpjsZ1rej5MWrxu225wspFWvx1m1R 6ZsWpUVa0fhOFEofJsX+Szdk5ITNJH8/C0dK7HMyALFSLLVY2bjiEg7rNM+C/McoGgM8 dk6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z22si1719552oto.237.2020.03.26.16.31.46; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727775AbgCZXaa (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:30:30 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:43756 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726954AbgCZXaa (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:30:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02QNSlWb015673; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 23:28:47 GMT Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:28:47 +1100 (AEDT) From: James Morris To: Serge Hallyn cc: Alexey Budankov , Stephen Smalley , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , "joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com" , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , Paul Mackerras , Helge Deller , Thomas Gleixner , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "selinux@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Igor Lubashev , linux-kernel , Stephane Eranian , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Jiri Olsa , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability In-Reply-To: <20200302001913.GA21145@sl> Message-ID: References: <3ae0bed5-204e-de81-7647-5f0d8106cd67@linux.intel.com> <20200302001913.GA21145@sl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Thanks, this looks good to me, in keeping with the CAP_SYSLOG break. > > Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn > > for the set. > > James/Ingo/Peter, if noone has remaining objections, whose branch > should these go in through? > > thanks, > -serge > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there anything else I could do in order to move the changes forward > > or is something still missing from this patch set? > > Could you please share you mind? Alexey, It seems some of the previous Acks are not included in this patchset, e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/22/655 Every patch needs a Reviewed-by or Acked-by from maintainers of the code being changed. You have enough from the security folk, but I can't see any included from the perf folk. -- James Morris