Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:17:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:17:32 -0400 Received: from 213-187-164-5.dd.nextgentel.com ([213.187.164.5]:24721 "EHLO mushkin.ii.uib.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:17:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:17:30 +0200 From: Jan-Frode Myklebust To: Christoph Rohland Cc: ML-linux-kernel Subject: Re: Kernel Compile in tmpfs crumples in 2.4.12 w/epoll patch Message-ID: <20011020171730.A28057@parallab.uib.no> Mail-Followup-To: Jan-Frode Myklebust , Christoph Rohland , ML-linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <016a01c15831$ef51c5c0$5c044589@legato.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from cr@sap.com on Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:28:37AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote: > > > > Is tmpfs stable? > > I merged the tmpfs from -ac into the stock kernel. So there was > something changed which maybe is broken. Were there any kernel > messages, oopses? > > Exactly the parallel kernel make is one of my regression tests for > tmpfs. Further on I do not see how tmpfs should interfere with the > library pages. make, ls etc use tmpfs pages. So I suspect it's > something else. > Running BitKeeper regression tests fails for me on tmpfs /tmp/. I have reported it to the bitkeeper bugtracking, but am not sure if this is a bitkeeper or tmpfs bug. Any insight? http://bitkeeper.bkserver.com/cgi-bin/bugview?open/2001-09-11-001 Last tested with Bitkeeper 2.0 on linux 2.4.10-xfs. -jf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/