Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200324135328.5796-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <20200324135653.6676-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20200324135653.6676-5-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <CACRpkdZuQrPqFPyoop9pv6MVwqwz_C6ZNKMxWqSFXdAMkhbsvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZuQrPqFPyoop9pv6MVwqwz_C6ZNKMxWqSFXdAMkhbsvQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:45:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVpiO+KGRTF=83kubuuJF2p8TJhWe_X32amSTa6bXsCxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] gpiolib: Introduce gpiod_set_config()
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@mentor.com>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
        Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:26 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:57 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> > The GPIO Aggregator will need a method to forward a .set_config() call
> > to its parent gpiochip.  This requires obtaining the gpio_chip and
> > offset for a given gpio_desc.  While gpiod_to_chip() is public,
> > gpio_chip_hwgpio() is not, so there is currently no method to obtain the
> > needed GPIO offset parameter.
> >
> > Hence introduce a public gpiod_set_config() helper, which invokes the
> > .set_config() callback through a gpio_desc pointer, like is done for
> > most other gpio_chip callbacks.
> >
> > Rewrite the existing gpiod_set_debounce() helper as a wrapper around
> > gpiod_set_config(), to avoid duplication.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > ---
> > v6:
> >   - New.
>
> This is nice, I tried to actually just apply this (you also sent some
> two cleanups that I tried to apply) byt Yue's cleanup patch
> commit d18fddff061d2796525e6d4a958cb3d30aed8efd
> "gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()"
> makes none of them apply :/

/me confused.

That commit was reverted later, so it shouldn't matter.

I have just verified, and both my full series and just this single
patch, do apply fine to all of current gpio/for-next, linus/master, and
next-20200327.  They even apply fine to gpio/for-next before or after
the two cleanups I sent, too.

What am I missing?
Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds