Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751107AbWBWBbk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:31:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751497AbWBWBbj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:31:39 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:63404 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbWBWBbj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:31:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:31:01 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alessandro Zummo Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] RTC subsystem, class Message-Id: <20060222173101.4ba9060e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060223020952.42124378@inspiron> References: <20060219232211.368740000@towertech.it> <20060219232211.628944000@towertech.it> <20060222141554.0f5e2aa3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060223020952.42124378@inspiron> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 662 Lines: 18 Alessandro Zummo wrote: > > How can I handle further updates, just repost the whole patchset > to lkml ? Yes, that would be best. Once the patches are settled down I prefer incremental updates so we can see what changed, but at this stage in proceedings a wholesale replacement is OK. It would be good if you can arrange it so there are no build-breaks anywhere in the series. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/