Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2393633ybb; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:48:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt6y42GsUk0hv1cq3KezoSv+uyX8nmJTS+xNImCwy/glKKZKtqYa7oQ2zlIVVVYTbXV1eVs X-Received: by 2002:a9d:306:: with SMTP id 6mr10469691otv.185.1585309738864; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:48:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585309738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Zk75pIi6Ui5lvc16ubIvZrMtyEf3laYKJG2L1faFbD9ubxMNHJFAuRLV8q8NgxVWR5 8XqmMg3xLWNyZyrhK+NpSe1UM5Al50WXwMZE25OF1L6thEJAzRU9NQiVU2v3OWMLdpqn auDbJqYg+mZDEHszzkV/9Q5TBrYFDaiPoW4CzKNWCIhS1gB988xEQQ1zrInLitEVJAaH T913abpYZh0eLHpTN2vzAor7jXhCVfPgelaSlqeLm5FRNN3AVgTvuV22T43kVwOHq/Q+ 6f/3dSZ71Ov+BZv97dYM2trsEOt4I8577+jf3onO9GIF+C2RWiLgZNuWHzN/JWNHUA0h iZlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=ROC9TJxKKo/mh3Ar/o5FoSFMZlAeX1xna96Gmv1ZGTc=; b=B/uTntpnlvNMsRiC5GhK1kzaoWpFFTFciepCFo+EaHlXZBBhRj1jFrw9Zdl0uKzyea FVIKICE8oOT8ykO030Q3hVLfsJKTstBgfSl54xSI7YoEy2vn123Vq+riyNkKwC+XCknW EZ9/NHjwWOV48qT6ssLQNbTZjy+bi7vYHx47fB+QMbFsWDdwsJldrzoTVWJspu6uO6M1 UaONC78uZecva1Xrw0OOsT+4wieUqptIgBCKYQPvgy4NKbcNnw6Bewa8G9J6cATBW+MT ikn4MywqtZHhg34F/4+HLRAdD/RkxcWwtGiHInz9EyT/3gpDGbSGq4FHU2WhRq0CX0bD YChQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a206si2158957oii.132.2020.03.27.04.48.43; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:48:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726758AbgC0Lq4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:46:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52324 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726165AbgC0Lq4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:46:56 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F94DABE9; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <65a2d18ec2b901c6a89acc091cf9573a98fda75f.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Fix HDMI mode validation From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne To: Eric Anholt , Daniel Vetter Cc: maxime@cerno.tech, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, Stefan Wahren , Dave Stevenson , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:46:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200326122001.22215-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> References: <20200326122001.22215-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iTT4P/76bH6ldtNpzKaw" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-iTT4P/76bH6ldtNpzKaw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 13:20 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Current mode validation impedes setting up some video modes which should > be supported otherwise. Namely 1920x1200@60Hz. >=20 > Fix this by lowering the minimum HDMI state machine clock to pixel clock > ratio allowed. >=20 > Fixes: 32e823c63e90 ("drm/vc4: Reject HDMI modes with too high of clocks"= ) > Reported-by: Stefan Wahren > Suggested-by: Dave Stevenson > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Would it be possible for you to take this in for v5.7 (or as a fix for v5.6= , but it seems a little late)? A device-tree patch I have to channel trough the SoC tree depends on this t= o avoid regressions. Regards, Nicolas --=-iTT4P/76bH6ldtNpzKaw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEErOkkGDHCg2EbPcGjlfZmHno8x/4FAl5956wACgkQlfZmHno8 x/71DAf7B3ekZLOCXw9+R/a+ahSyPrsNHq1P6dzIGD6ifYIhw0z2o9RynjiWrVXR NDEjE8EYZXkiY3su8sXVNooI6/UsMGdkt4uxl4RXt6nic8561/HvS4B0g0ZXgQNm HfLymT4h/x9ccphfxHTOkusKgHtF+Bb80qkD1Nb0LWpLkni63WiN5G22hTLWJLxx +8vcUD5Dt5HYl7rGMCdcPQ/Wgs6KS/Gfit8jYWrTFvbAqzEwSDTWSJoE2Sp8aqnf Gn2yEbFF63bX3/1/HMOaL8oFPpRZIx7ztmdwSuRLx0PaqQF2D0HpvXun/7mbnhSi 5DnAf/YNQZpZHCuWOA5JhUrzzox61Q== =IHbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iTT4P/76bH6ldtNpzKaw--