Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CGME20200327082453eucas1p15b2371b61f653031408f319cc6d13893@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <20200327082446.18480-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <CABnpCuDySf89HL2AksMB2fOcVCci+1zgB9r8zjRdpCAH3GWhPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <64025801-10f0-9f28-17b2-2c04d4308ac5@samsung.com> <CABnpCuBUEO6V=hwzHkUEKK5KDXC=ovPrTHyb9zFYrj0KaHHdww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABnpCuBUEO6V=hwzHkUEKK5KDXC=ovPrTHyb9zFYrj0KaHHdww@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:16:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CADnq5_N65tF-b772uJ2E72=Er8JeeX9UZ34PVGqssprHCMGF1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from a scatterlist
To:     Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@gmail.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "for 3.8" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Michael J . Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:25 AM Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Marek,
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 9:00 AM Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > > I have tested the above patch against my original issues with amdgpu
> > > and radeon drivers and everything is still working as expected.
> > >
> > > Sorry I missed this in my original patches.
> >
> > No problem. Thanks for testing!
> >
> > Best regards
> > --
> > Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> >
> Just a thought.
>
> Would it be worth adding some comments to the code to explain why this
> is needed, reading
> the thread around my original patches and the DMA-API documentation it
> is not instantly
> clear why you would be mapping the pages in this way.
>
> Would probably prevent someone in the future making the same mistake I
> did while updating
> this code.

With a comment similar to the commit messaged added to this function,
this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Thanks!

Alex