Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:28:11 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbJ3DBO+W4P0n-CfZ1T3L8d_L0Nizra8frkv92XPXR4WA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200317205017.28280-1-michael@walle.cc>
 <20200317205017.28280-13-michael@walle.cc>
 <CAMpxmJW770v6JLdveEe1hkgNEJByVyArhorSyUZBYOyFiVyOeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9c310f2a11913d4d089ef1b07671be00@walle.cc>
 <CAMpxmJXmD-M+Wbj6=wgFgP2aDxbqDN=ceHi1XDun4iwdLm55Zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <22944c9b62aa69da418de7766b7741bd@walle.cc>
 <CACRpkdbJ3DBO+W4P0n-CfZ1T3L8d_L0Nizra8frkv92XPXR4WA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4d8d3bc26bdf73eb5c0e5851589fe085@walle.cc>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.10
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Am 2020-03-27 11:20, schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:06 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> Am 2020-03-25 12:50, schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski:
> 
>> > In that case maybe you should use the disable_locking option in
>> > regmap_config and provide your own callbacks that you can use in the
>> > irqchip code too?
>> 
>> But how would that solve problem (1). And keep in mind, that the
>> reqmap_irqchip is actually used for the interrupt controller, which
>> is not this gpio controller.
>> 
>> Ie. the interrupt controller of the sl28cpld uses the regmap_irqchip
>> and all interrupt phandles pointing to the interrupt controller will
>> reference the toplevel node. Any phandles pointing to the gpio
>> controller will reference the GPIO subnode.
> 
> Ideally we would create something generic that has been on my
> mind for some time, like a generic GPIO regmap irqchip now that
> there are a few controllers like that.
> 
> I don't know how feasible it is or how much work it would be. But
> as with GPIO_GENERIC (for MMIO) it would be helpful since we
> can then implement things like .set_multiple() and .get_multiple()
> for everyone.

For starters, would that be a drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c or a
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-gpio.c? I would assume the first,
because the stuff in drivers/base/regmap operates on a given
regmap and we'd just be using one, correct? On the other hand
there is also the reqmap-irq.c. But as pointed out before, it
will add an interrupt controller to the regmap, not a device
so to speak.

-michael