Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2680334ybb; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtrL0HkapJZIzQIN6Offmx3dG5HA9A3kumBwLBjo2uxh4vtdG2oC0/TyhuQwdPlXm3EfSFA X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5181:: with SMTP id y1mr10998434otg.199.1585328686273; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585328686; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J4g03HfBzHWVH6gp6vpHIcfoRi/B9LzCd9+LD6jVlsOpb4OfBErBV2Mb1ySyL1Bj68 8FORBdByMtJiaTAXbV3btIQOm4AnzuKcD/JEfT4vmKduvudRHA0bKEFsmOWgjQtUKiwe caRrNkusms6CEjbRpOcL4edlEGBCddNZOCaVGSvROW59oI6xeCexab0Hdv5q9DhRIVz+ mc4u6Fo/FUgmmJ9qaIPgxidm7kvh4wfoiQ22RScvHjnS1Jfzi9iSxDkdQJKLisoes3p8 VHwA29wUu9S5v36j61+md7XNZlZLoCsovwUxvVWAaHhLihO/QGzhIi91IlNUzBBgsVRb vaIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=xgqBmGFcgmAIdNZaNev/ykipujsmshcQYrM46g0jrHU=; b=sEpoZgmittyqq2dUI/9lmBAzy1q62Al/104tsPcSbLtiMwuR7w3h2raGf+fTYN8QiF A5RiU/JehQyj6iRcSmUPaUO/yAhrN8D1VuEhnFYZ9AsKUZQyFqQEgHTdtKhGwT8jylV0 1GXk7mRvnKVTScF/MvVre93JiVKUU38JUk3LOTmu4AJi6xFGKuijS5xgy5wa2QxRR+K5 WlvJZuGgLO9p/2Nc6zzChiijqidCDLdH20kltpmMQdTEoa4E9kSnOAQOd4is8HLWe6Vi 84ufs2LzBWKFRRtmkOW0MF/FLixWS491oW+SlE+oTKs+I8HjhCqFeJNme+reXZwkFpWC RxhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q12si2562326ooi.0.2020.03.27.10.04.17; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727726AbgC0RDr (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:03:47 -0400 Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]:52188 "EHLO asavdk4.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbgC0RDr (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:03:47 -0400 Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [158.248.194.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asavdk4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CC780618; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:03:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:03:42 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Alex Deucher , Wolfram Sang , amd-gfx list , David Airlie , LKML , Maling list - DRI developers , Linux I2C , Alex Deucher , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/radeon: convert to use i2c_new_client_device() Message-ID: <20200327170342.GA5572@ravnborg.org> References: <20200326211005.13301-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20200326211005.13301-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20200327152535.GA2191@ravnborg.org> <20200327154509.GB3971@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327154509.GB3971@ninjato> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=XpTUx2N9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:117 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=LDBv8-xUAAAA:8 a=zd2uoN0lAAAA:8 a=jdWeosqewm8peECdMA0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=DZeXCJrVpAJBw65Qk4Ds:22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > Move away from the deprecated API. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > > > > > patches 1,6, are: > > > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher > > > Should we commit all to drm-misc-next? > > > > I'm fine to see it go through whatever tree makes sense. > > I'd suggest drm-misc-next to minimize merge conflicts. But I can take it > via I2C tree, too, if desired. If no-one else speaks up until tomorrow I will land them in drm-misc-next. Just wanted to make sure it was OK. Sam