Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750976AbWBWKJl (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:09:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751098AbWBWKJl (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:09:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:1675 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750976AbWBWKJl (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:09:41 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] fast VMA recycling Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:05:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <1140686238.2972.30.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200602231042.53696.ak@suse.de> <1140688131.4672.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1140688131.4672.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602231105.30581.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 33 On Thursday 23 February 2006 10:48, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 10:42 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thursday 23 February 2006 10:30, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > This patch adds a per task-struct cache of a free vma. > > > > > > In normal operation, it is a really common action during userspace mmap > > > or malloc to first allocate a vma, and then find out that it can be merged, > > > and thus free it again. In fact this is the case roughly 95% of the time. > > > > > > In addition, this patch allows code to "prepopulate" the cache, and > > > this is done as example for the x86_64 mmap codepath. The advantage of this > > > prepopulation is that the memory allocation (which is a sleeping operation > > > due to the GFP_KERNEL flag, potentially causing either a direct sleep or a > > > voluntary preempt sleep) will happen before the mmap_sem is taken, and thus > > > reduces lock hold time (and thus the contention potential) > > > > The slab fast path doesn't sleep. > > it does via might_sleep() Hmm? That shouldn't sleep. If it takes any time in a real workload then it should move into DEBUG_KERNEL too. But I doubt it. Something with your analysis is wrong. -Andi P.S.: Your email address bounces. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/