Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750889AbWBWLvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:51:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750946AbWBWLvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:51:47 -0500 Received: from 220-130-178-142.HINET-IP.hinet.net ([220.130.178.142]:64842 "EHLO areca.com.tw") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750889AbWBWLvq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:51:46 -0500 Message-ID: <005a01c6386f$84b30d50$b100a8c0@erich2003> From: "erich" To: "Arjan van de Ven" Cc: "\"\"Christoph Hellwig\"\"" , , , , , , References: <1140458552.3495.26.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com> <20060220182045.GA1634@infradead.org> <001401c63779$12e49aa0$b100a8c0@erich2003> <20060222145733.GC16269@infradead.org> <00dc01c63842$381f9a30$b100a8c0@erich2003> <1140683157.2972.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <001901c6385e$9aee7d40$b100a8c0@erich2003> <1140688569.4672.24.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Subject: Re: Areca RAID driver remaining items? Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:51:41 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="big5"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2006 11:47:37.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1392550:01C6386E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2421 Lines: 70 Dear Arjan van de Ven, Thanks for your answer. I will remove CONFIG_SCSI_ARCMSR_MSI in next patch. If Linux can not assurent the contingous memory space allocating of "dma_alloc_coherent" . When arcmsr get a physical ccb address from areca's firmware. Does linux has any functions for converting of "bus to virtual" ? Best Regards Erich Chen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arjan van de Ven" To: "erich" Cc: ""Christoph Hellwig"" ; ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 5:56 PM Subject: Re: Areca RAID driver remaining items? > On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 17:50 +0800, erich wrote: >> Dear Arjan van de Ven, >> >> The following contex is coming from comment of Christoph Hellwig. >> >> - msi should be a module options if at all, but defintitly not >> a config options >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_ARCMSR_MSI >> if (!pci_enable_msi(pci_device)) >> pACB->acb_flags |= ACB_F_HAVE_MSI; >> #endif >> >> I make an option config for prevent some mainboards hang up if arcmsr >> enable >> msi function. >> Areca RAID controller is bridged hardware. >> There were a lots of mainboards had wrong IRQ routing table issue with >> it. >> If somebody meet this issue and people can enable msi function to fix its >> hardware bug. >> But unfortunately I found some mainboards will hang up if I always enable >> this function in my lab. >> To avoid this issue, I do an option for this case. > > > yes the reason for making this optional is clear, and Christoph also > understands that. > > However the idea that Christoph is proposing is to not make it a compile > time option, but a runtime option. Compile-time is not very flexible, > especially not for linux distributions. Making it a module option means > it becomes runtime behavior, and the user can load the module like > > modprobe aerca msi=0 > > and msi gets turned off. No need to recompile anything! That has many > advantages over a more inflexible (from the user view) compiletime-only > option. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/