Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp512032ybb;
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 04:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvBeKn4CyNFwRigAv7Hjg+cuznhJMH95dgrXrRegFZ8veoM5bCd/CeEtpL1cwCefDi09BQU
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ad8f:: with SMTP id w137mr1977979oie.104.1585394624481;
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 04:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585394624; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=eBhMO9OPiACbceKGfYIrPyWbq1qI7pwObEUeHFz8bsCPdQoKH6tPhqebpfCw1jsGBp
         Hg8vIfUdMkpWtfE7bV4Cye3Cr9Ma/OVzySFfvpU4Tx0H9HS+2HmdE/V82qagg7C0m+34
         pt0ZpWoPSz6HG53sdaJJi+Ni2uacvSZs8vRI0yvkITMdLMHHOomEdzVW1nI0qO4T9NJJ
         Jq9UTaXESw6HxnXUdpLR2KDZc0xoNEATO6W8Mpdo4SKKratzVD1KbNAp09lR0pxDw+1v
         4L5aIZ0i7W/eTpChGm8EzR67LbWuwmefApWETKO6x1e7QaHQogI3RczCIDjLkAz8unMj
         qdZg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc
         :to:from:date;
        bh=7WUgA/8wh7vJtGCcVUUFnJUb3w0JOzThRFSnkKmSXmg=;
        b=lKjiVuPRQXKVBvUcD+PgylbCmROnKYTGzcFAKdAxTJq4Avknd647LyHCbpQCzvuVxy
         wXyAtNBAW74suZMfyz0JaQLnhsWlv1jr+2W9oSsv2qDXJOIGLQN2duyyKVhcUAMxRu0t
         dOHQdgQnSVAB1SulplC5NplgRFySrth+LZGY/odN10Bm+WIliELhuDGa8HQ5O/n6Cm4s
         yhCO/of3bXsLNu+fuxHBiF/RNZfvpiOBa18J7WQSdSyche5Vg4GONzaFVxEg8LDN7EsF
         kgKScpFMRtHxTmVxugcNhxNZf2TMV4JSJgJNznhC21NTHr1w6vegInQyfwplHU1iUc+c
         JhBQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si3858114oti.70.2020.03.28.04.23.31;
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 04:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726373AbgC1LXF (ORCPT <rfc822;noahbdev@gmail.com> + 99 others);
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:23:05 -0400
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:33316 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725973AbgC1LXF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:23:05 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B382026E;
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id oQgVZv6pDhUT; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F54201E4;
        Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199) by
 MAIL-ESSEN-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 14.3.487.0; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100
Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de
 (10.53.40.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Sat, 28 Mar
 2020 12:23:02 +0100
Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)      id 1433931801E6;
 Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:02 +0100 (CET)
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:02 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
CC:     <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xfrm: policy: Remove obsolete WARN while xfrm
 policy inserting
Message-ID: <20200328112302.GA13121@gauss3.secunet.de>
References: <20200327123443.12408-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200327123443.12408-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To
 mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199)
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:34:43PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Since commit 7cb8a93968e3 ("xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching
> mark and different priorities"), we allow duplicate policies with
> different priority, this WARN is not needed any more.

Can you please describe a bit more detailed why this warning
can't trigger anymore?

Thanks!