Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>, julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Cc:     boqun.feng@gmail.com, Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@example.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        "open list\:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] locking/rtmutex: Remove Comparison to bool
In-Reply-To: <20200327212358.5752-2-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
References: <20200327212358.5752-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com> <20200327212358.5752-2-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:28:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2rkwwf5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@example.com>
>
> Coccinelle reports a warning inside rt_mutex_slowunlock()
>
> WARNING: Comparison to bool
>
> To fix this, the comparison to bool is removed
> This not only fixes the issue but also removes the unnecessary comparison.
>
> Remove comparison to bool

So you explain 3 times in different ways that the comparison to bool is
removed. What's the point?

Thanks,

        tglx