Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:08:25 +0000
From:   George Spelvin <lkml@SDF.ORG>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lkml@sdf.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/50] IB/qib: Delete struct qib_ivdev.qp_rnd
Message-ID: <20200329160825.GA4675@SDF.ORG>
References: <202003281643.02SGh6eG002694@sdf.org>
 <20200329141710.GE20941@ziepe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200329141710.GE20941@ziepe.ca>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:17:10AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> You need to do a better job sending your patches, this is not
> threaded, and not cc'd to linux-rdma, so it doesn't show in the
> patchworks.

Indeed; mea culpa.  I forgot the magic option to git-format-patch.

Unfortunately, such things tend to get noticed only after the e-mail
has been sent and one has embarrassed oneself publicly.  :-(

> In general, do not send such large series for things that are not
> connected. Send small cleanups like this properly and directly so they
> can be applied.

They're all concpetually connected, but yes.

> I took care of it this time, so applied to the rdma tree as it is
> obviously correct.

I will drop it from my series, thank you!