Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1994824ybb; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:24:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsp2L2+TUQMm+d3EnoUqf/x5K+8jq9fK3CqK8B+rgi3iRrvWGaK02HOjlvwmcRweVtE0+6r X-Received: by 2002:aca:646:: with SMTP id 67mr6024959oig.4.1585535053821; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:24:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585535053; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sBebPb+P7P0EM5OsfPKUAEkflvgm6Gp2YeghB1ZFOpPtYzV2o+2idU1bjwIuzfKa34 jjcwmL61Q8JD48pO5B4UX0OiSuusfqSj41U8wa3DC+y4JVgRSxuILD03EhDIIPUWekmG f8fsjO1MbvNRyFtZV+JRmOUogpNnf2SwwhNTLrQ3FqRRMm85VAtBS1MAy3HNMTTM1lSo 0S3uL9BN+Q12U5ouc0ZgVrmPk2Zxu9bFuvEjeMvL6nfRNcjLEonpfCpZ92TElRDM3Rkf K5Mqo75Dewz9zhKMAWDrfCFu4B2+FUjy8yLunuCQAgXO9ulbWVZvREAsawslTiRkQMLA hFFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from; bh=B2a2+CX3JBJAZoWqS4B/lRh66Itdso6uvXf5AFCfC7U=; b=us0K+Ro04AlwUNhIXTI9UB4VhkG/3R44ClmOr4tUH9JtxWMQQrDNSG5SEzYoNJGLJ9 0gsX9iS/EfWL2Y6b46MCrdXkQOrfXAEQ1WoKKlBxeDW1azORyaIHz9XI0W6vAcewFyhS TfGmKayvJS/D1ifnHcNjjr0Np47DIwKkMriChHVcURFAGh/4rgYlXk4ezeUWuzhCrG0s ycxkHOrEI4lgwOK+ZgFtTTuPoghDJFRkc8hP4MAKF1r+MRvriIyuQ2ifE/ikin+I7N0s cGhE9A+booPiFu2dl7EWPrP3cW4+EtBd34GX4vT9M4Mbh1mTosoOL0efvnEK2goqlC4w uAMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u125si4925184oie.52.2020.03.29.19.24.01; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728901AbgC3CWe (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:22:34 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:37920 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728124AbgC3CWe (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:22:34 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7B67CCD849F6DC75F87C; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:22:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.28) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:22:20 +0800 From: Jason Yan To: , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , Jason Yan Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/64 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:20:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20200330022023.3691-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.28] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a try to implement KASLR for Freescale BookE64 which is based on my earlier implementation for Freescale BookE32: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=131718&state=* The implementation for Freescale BookE64 is similar as BookE32. One difference is that Freescale BookE64 set up a TLB mapping of 1G during booting. Another difference is that ppc64 needs the kernel to be 64K-aligned. So we can randomize the kernel in this 1G mapping and make it 64K-aligned. This can save some code to creat another TLB map at early boot. The disadvantage is that we only have about 1G/64K = 16384 slots to put the kernel in. KERNELBASE 64K |--> kernel <--| | | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | | |....| | | | | | | | | |....| | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | 1G |-----> offset <-----| kernstart_virt_addr I'm not sure if the slot numbers is enough or the design has any defects. If you have some better ideas, I would be happy to hear that. Thank you all. v4->v5: Fix "-Werror=maybe-uninitialized" compile error. Fix typo "similar as" -> "similar to". v3->v4: Do not define __kaslr_offset as a fixed symbol. Reference __run_at_load and __kaslr_offset by symbol instead of magic offsets. Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32) instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32. Change kaslr-booke32 to kaslr-booke in index.rst Switch some instructions to 64-bit. v2->v3: Fix build error when KASLR is disabled. v1->v2: Add __kaslr_offset for the secondary cpu boot up. Jason Yan (6): powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: refactor kaslr_legal_offset() and kaslr_early_init() powerpc/fsl_booke/64: introduce reloc_kernel_entry() helper powerpc/fsl_booke/64: implement KASLR for fsl_booke64 powerpc/fsl_booke/64: do not clear the BSS for the second pass powerpc/fsl_booke/64: clear the original kernel if randomized powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: rename kaslr-booke32.rst to kaslr-booke.rst and add 64bit part Documentation/powerpc/index.rst | 2 +- .../{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} | 35 ++++++- arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S | 23 +++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 13 +++ arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 3 + arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_decl.h | 23 +++-- arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/kaslr_booke.c | 91 +++++++++++++------ 8 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) rename Documentation/powerpc/{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} (59%) -- 2.17.2