Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2443013ybb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtCe740aSMqm3jtOj91v6bSKnrx05RZECgvAaAL0eZagOhvbL5LM6ss6jYnSZbyTS4BFWwB X-Received: by 2002:a4a:3bd7:: with SMTP id s206mr4334415oos.89.1585574266100; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:17:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585574266; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tE3ak4r7wVIHiVZIHX6QWSaWxjdSht6HIWvSB4R5rO5scxjJDSIDSgyErmzQw2YL+b sVBsi31DCKIP8P/iaOeK4kBcSkqTqLsRuUS7U/BcsAn+4f7LfYY8sPUayJWeinEjaqji /su1awAWmvmLjn9ufBDqbYvyAlqsmCh6LQCfcQcUz5sgqiCEpy1JoKlZyuuazdvu8CIw Tc1OABKB2pZZD5gWkPhkMeR4PMENLjr9dlHTjoPViHtH4RKkZSB881ST/K70qvWX5tMf qRi9gXJqOmKSaplzvVpLyZE741Kf2Z4bXPMdOP5innVNcBnSv+xKCqXz3i7q3YSrTsda DOCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=9WABOcS1fimfaEnpKg44uyT/bLAis2cwVX+4PXuzKxg=; b=nvDdaUc4GEjMY7WONJRSyCGe/YcZcmKBO8SlzzExPOeqo7WoF/GQVRKSRUPfc1fgxA b39PYWtgeeyzoK7tptWo4RPGHaYngJP3/6uWcXIHyPLIQvuFOLBHr0axX6HQ4CINeYPf 8vpkuV1Xh5N1Npr9ZhHfLIM5nqQ3JjU4WAs9XIGxMHDe3dukaDi3OLSEygrbObiRn2Jn k4hCCjBtKi4kpROZqOfbJXCrJkare88hQDOIBHRP/75u+Mmqur6G2ZE43OJ085LGtKNX /dwGBMg/55zk9czxw78ltLynYMF/s4VsVDhCPA8WAxi6oERwnbE+PefJPL/I82v6AO9M gAwg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e7si5954114ook.12.2020.03.30.06.17.32; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730321AbgC3NQw (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:16:52 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53396 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730191AbgC3NQw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:16:52 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964A030E; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.37.12.97]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CD203F71E; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:16:46 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Naresh Kamboju , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Robin Murphy , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , Basil Eljuse , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux-Next Mailing List , fntoth@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , Anders Roxell Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] driver core: Replace open-coded list_last_entry() Message-ID: <20200330131646.GC20031@bogus> References: <20200324122023.9649-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20200324122023.9649-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <028b636f-6e0f-c36a-aa4e-6a16d936fc6a@arm.com> <20200330095707.GA10432@bogus> <20200330104340.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200330104340.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:43:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: [...] > > How this warning related to the patch in the subject? Does revert of the patch > gives you no warning? (I will be very surprised). > I did a quick check reverting the $subject patch and it doesn't remove extra warning. Sorry for the noise, I assumed so hastily, I was wrong. -- Regards, Sudeep