Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2452864ybb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:29:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsyFo8ck6es0lKJuFyLg07InCTDnRfVxcsiKhuZUhzMKnZubuA49r2rz7FxzoQ8iy3+rZCL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:346:: with SMTP id m6mr9588482ooe.22.1585574980628; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:29:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585574980; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EZVV4FAkb7P+cF0JtrM4iEp4Sy+tw+DgGkAeWBQMleKJkJhBtRTRAOWZQhUxm1c/y9 g5EeG8ZUh8gEETVbfQnWcljvsStq9gqcoUO5DOD8aDVjsnP9WJsebOiI6O2CuodI1Ofm szPTXLwiYGwCXR0SczzqeZ/gLJf+bJseewa09IP3Mke/fMZaud+E+8UiIKM2cn4NQ21U eIyn3Eo4EwRP4QpK5boW31khyx2YGB6JR/oKqdiDGafMKdiNshqUaMx9neCIAC9C1I1a EZ9DOXNcZdbOu5/mTeRv/fyanzaXE6HX3MWy96jg5MSruYJ/aiB62kP5mVTDLzzOJZb4 WN7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Rmh3io0HvtjpyXyeBKAatTgZ5wgtE8/46Nby38pmFhg=; b=RtqkVO0AXaQyxOEHwv/raQNknKZ9lCETEC1yLkxK/4OM1ykdY50iYpCCy6byre6egX 4R+WEjW3jAoA4hXyheJPlgA6yOe83UwUyGaD0jQPB/vV4MtCCJuGNAiST0Mvjat79TkS 1HOWBmAfsGPqt/muCt6IbMcHwMEMqlUsh3Ck+26SRR3L58NtFEvMJuL7XC6tAOXCLx/2 vCu+nZOn6AzYvMaCPHngSKVlXO8rpllMCZPQAPvBpcjx60yrY/8bv+5eZgVy7LQ1N3E2 piA2Nd50cEMD2MTFJC/CRQb2Ofi4MvjzUCIwBNixfuSqSmixEiwDhtNLCpFWq68cWHFb VdnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si1748491oti.55.2020.03.30.06.29.26; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726830AbgC3N2M (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:28:12 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53676 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725268AbgC3N2M (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:28:12 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934F1101E; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC99B3F71E; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:28:08 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: George Spelvin Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dennis Dalessandro , Mike Marciniszyn , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/50] IB/qib: Delete struct qib_ivdev.qp_rnd Message-ID: <20200330132808.GB20969@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <202003281643.02SGh6eG002694@sdf.org> <20200329141710.GE20941@ziepe.ca> <20200329160825.GA4675@SDF.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200329160825.GA4675@SDF.ORG> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 04:08:25PM +0000, George Spelvin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:17:10AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > You need to do a better job sending your patches, this is not > > threaded, and not cc'd to linux-rdma, so it doesn't show in the > > patchworks. > > Indeed; mea culpa. I forgot the magic option to git-format-patch. > > Unfortunately, such things tend to get noticed only after the e-mail > has been sent and one has embarrassed oneself publicly. :-( > > > In general, do not send such large series for things that are not > > connected. Send small cleanups like this properly and directly so they > > can be applied. > > They're all concpetually connected, but yes. Also, if you do send a series, *please* add a cover-letter explaining what the overall purpose of the series is, and have all patches chained in-reply-to that rather than patch 1. Otherwise reviewers have to reverse-engineer the intent of the author. You can generate the cover letter with: $ git format-patch --cover $FROM..$TO ... and IIRC git send-email does the right thing by default if you hand it all of the patches at once. Thanks, Mark.