Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2478149ybb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:00:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs7Gsg8ZTTB7v1by1/nXUp25HCMMlpbBs41WoSqExz1tJptlqepkn4uUF3ky/NwqHtdEQxx X-Received: by 2002:a4a:95a8:: with SMTP id o37mr9334283ooi.40.1585576823369; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:00:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585576823; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fO23R5Bo80Lw4FJcXWAk37MkW2a4kI3YBFBDVobl4UnaWC80FXpoU0VDDKJgNmpjBk iRMeuMba65u47ZkQJX/ldHVmZhuvUi23qgIFMS7QmxIAe5k/3qtPr9tTx0wQzM4E1byx rCPG+e+BbUip9+jTH50lKRBZ8VsE7p9YlMfyRKXVp76oZfYcx8eV88j0pLq1+/fxh92q sOBtf0Yej6GgS/TrF9iH9+pcGaSjT5RXo0cEQlpHGRWRDZD9qy+kbgDBcYOCilxZpHct zyY/RjNdolgHTWeDBxJ8fH4UfCbjHmM/d1rwSekwpQciQQ17VI5rvqG6t8HURDweH8iU tcQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=/jEgHPLAGewhelNLXBHg4HxEkeblkRhmsJ2Rit1NjgQ=; b=CbUZW2daLEjzyo3dd9nXULSmeCwpV8brwvSopE75KXy2sDPJXAtucjm1lyDAhTmAsI ziIx/6hfx0820bW76pkfJodNRBR6QI0HpzHCq+XW4qGW0K5enmpqEKykdBfz5br7vdXW RDyGSLxRwO+NRjJJL22bXpTMCo9gw+ivbse2zzNUK+c+wC3bD0ZjhT+4CtkZTKjB9eln DMROayWsOb8O/7Ga1XlA4mMg6zjst8H7TAxBJgN16dC85UvZj7x2Ay5JTHWM2dq8YkF8 D1A9Wxa7YtjrLD4zjBeZiYFnujKtEK+nmIdl1UBPUE4qiGgBOFbi1qMqhrPqzl7tT7bO FqVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23si5986973oih.275.2020.03.30.07.00.08; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728716AbgC3NZq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:25:46 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:58765 "EHLO relay9-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727370AbgC3NZq (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:25:46 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.224.148.103 Received: from xps13 (unknown [91.224.148.103]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A829FF806; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:25:39 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Xiaoming Ni Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd:clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly Message-ID: <20200330152539.1395e456@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1585573869-81863-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com> References: <1585573869-81863-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Xiaoming, Xiaoming Ni wrote on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:11:09 +0800: > The function call process is as follows: > mtd_blktrans_work() > while (1) > do_blktrans_request() > mtdblock_writesect() > do_cached_write() > write_cached_data() /*if cache_state is STATE_DIRTY*/ > erase_write() > > write_cached_data() returns failure without modifying cache_state > and cache_offset. So when do_cached_write() is called again, > write_cached_data() will be called again to perform erase_write() > on the same cache_offset. > > But if this cache_offset points to a bad block, erase_write() will > always return -EIO. Writing to this mtdblk is equivalent to losing > the current data, and repeatedly writing to the bad block. > > Repeatedly writing a bad block has no real benefits, > but brings some negative effects: > 1 Lost subsequent data > 2 Loss of flash device life > 3 erase_write() bad blocks are very time-consuming. For example: > the function do_erase_oneblock() in chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c or > chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c may take more than 20 seconds to return > > Therefore, when erase_write() returns -EIO in write_cached_data(), > clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni > Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal The title is still wrong. And you'll need a Fixes tag as well. Cc: stable is also a good idea. Thanks, Miquèl