Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
IronPort-SDR: NSlZJLyDft1JvgpDj5EfvA4sTcRyFL7dUMjd00CgTPNrKxIJB7QW4bHAJX+pwME93GyNiLPKli
 tAVV/EKY43eQ==
IronPort-SDR: c1V9JLhuvFlsnYYTIOb0W1i6yN2yoUTXzsVk+OcUNlMJBYhWG4stV7fnTWJ3U4CvNyCLXacXW7
 a/E6qORb0d6g==
From:   "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@gmail.com>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from
 a scatterlist
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from
 a scatterlist
Thread-Index: AQHWBFQRvRx+hOOiski5ycfWmHv7TahcuvpggAMSJICAAVxq4A==
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:46:10 +0000
Message-ID: <14063C7AD467DE4B82DEDB5C278E8663FFFC0C0E@fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CGME20200327162330eucas1p1b0413e0e9887aa76d3048f86d2166dcd@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <20200327162126.29705-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
 <14063C7AD467DE4B82DEDB5C278E8663FFFBFCE1@fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <8a09916d-5413-f9a8-bafa-2d8f0b8f892f@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a09916d-5413-f9a8-bafa-2d8f0b8f892f@samsung.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.6
dlp-reaction: no-action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>Marek Szyprowski
>Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 5:56 AM
>To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>; David Airlie
><airlied@linux.ie>; Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@gmail.com>;
>stable@vger.kernel.org; Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>;
>Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from
>a scatterlist
>
>Hi Michael,
>

<snip>

>> Is there an example of what the scatterlist would look like in this case?
>
>DMA framework or IOMMU is allowed to join consecutive chunks while
>mapping if such operation is supported by the hw. Here is the example:
>
>Lets assume that we have a scatterlist with 4 4KiB pages of the physical
>addresses: 0x12000000, 0x13011000, 0x13012000, 0x11011000. The total
>size of the buffer is 16KiB. After mapping this scatterlist to a device
>behind an IOMMU it may end up as a contiguous buffer in the DMA (IOVA)
>address space. at 0xf0010000. The scatterlist will look like this:
>
>sg[0].page = 0x12000000
>sg[0].len = 4096
>sg[0].dma_addr = 0xf0010000
>sg[0].dma_len = 16384
>sg[1].page = 0x13011000
>sg[1].len = 4096
>sg[1].dma_addr = 0
>sg[1].dma_len = 0
>sg[2].page = 0x13012000
>sg[2].len = 4096
>sg[2].dma_addr = 0
>sg[2].dma_len = 0
>sg[3].page = 0x11011000
>sg[3].len = 4096
>sg[3].dma_addr = 0
>sg[3].dma_len = 0
>
>(I've intentionally wrote page as physical address to make it easier to
>understand, in real SGs it is stored a struct page pointer).
>
>> Does each SG entry always have the page and dma info? or could you have
>> entries that have page information only, and entries that have dma info
>only?
>When SG is not mapped yet it contains only the ->pages and ->len
>entries. I'm not aware of the SGs with the DMA information only, but in
>theory it might be possible to have such.
>> If the same entry has different size info (page_len = PAGE_SIZE,
>> dma_len = 4 * PAGE_SIZE?), are we guaranteed that the arrays (page and
>addrs) have
>> been sized correctly?
>
>There are always no more DMA related entries than the phys pages. If
>there is 1:1 mapping between physical memory and DMA (IOVA) space, then
>each SG entry will have len == dma_len, and dma_addr will be describing
>the same as page entry. DMA mapping framework is allowed only to join
>entries while mapping to DMA (IOVA).
>
>> Just trying to get my head wrapped around this.
>
>Sure, I hope my explanation helps a bit.

That is a great example!  Thank you very much for the explanation.

I was somehow seeing it as the dma side getting split and extended (rather
than consolidated) into more possible entries.  This clarifies the issue for me.

Thanks!

Mike

>Best regards
>--
>Marek Szyprowski, PhD
>Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
>_______________________________________________
>dri-devel mailing list
>dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel