Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751575AbWBWTbY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:31:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751584AbWBWTbY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:31:24 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:46485 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751518AbWBWTbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:31:23 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Rene Herman Subject: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:31:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu References: <1140700758.4672.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <43FE0B9A.40209@keyaccess.nl> In-Reply-To: <43FE0B9A.40209@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602232031.03201.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 938 Lines: 25 On Thursday 23 February 2006 20:23, Rene Herman wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > The same should be true on x86, btw. Where we should use a physical start > > address of 4MB for best performance. > > Does 16MB still work? Gets the kernel out of the old ZONE_DMA. I suppose > not many people are really using that anyway anymore these days, but if > no downsides maybe? That would prevent booting on < 18MB or so > > Also, did the kernel still boot on a 4M machine, and would it still do > so with the change to 4M as posted? 2.4 used to boot fine with 4M. Not > certain anymore if I ever tested that with 2.6 (and can't right now). It wouldn't without additional changes. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/