Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2802725ybb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvtdm8FhOEt3mK8qfFrIwUCCp2giI9dmhEmyQqGXdN2bkWY4G28j67coJ+MNidMS0IL6mit X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2215:: with SMTP id o21mr5768739ota.113.1585599362945; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:16:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585599362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qIT1wtZwBO53Iz6WZ0Fb8PcyHrmN7EfwoEUMqy50z4DkrXZlVCA4m214roTlpV3pej gGbw4N2YmrTkJ0LQ3tgPODnBVzTA+ZYYBilyk7WjVtTH7KSwom8ffzasBYHDo+Sp9P3Q lgZrCbY0tH1SHN8zI+F4K3J/SKmyqdHGipmmapsa7IDS6qvwfHrq2nZ5ulDByCq/lP/i UNSgub5znjX7w4onxn5fMiWBNmMO8acgPdaRV8OZnwa1vAMg3reSOAFU30d85n2zhuad QM+DKn2Qa2kZbkwkpLsXS69dA5gLBld4yrkvMlpksn5VmEx8HVa+6J02iuhQxeSliV8o 5rjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=/xEbuMGYqmKuHMDUjBVJBLPSd80GP8iW0lTrFNQajdc=; b=TkAEc6TjCAzljGuohpRs8uXL7xtxkC1VC0z5wOdhUO0B1XSHNVwqQEthKbpTh7c7ye uBgDMNOW+J2kzPsMx1uyg8l24k1ddXQ9AIb0OnwfebuCGBmHeitttr+aOmhA7AT/g55r 5YE5bcsvoPgDZ6CrfAefghJncdfvCW56uLtyVTELu/Avm20/q2d1BaMjCxP/uFtSTrUZ TJkuknRrv6yKKsbGduqggDoDy08Z9LW/ae3bEV1xpi3JAyUZ+obQC0ar0m9RkAqhb0nS iKVxZmftNwBM+mFsRPs3fSpeLVRc+FqTGOfygsDKt3m3Mru6+aBJ4ZVzY+XFt91bIvao 0cXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=RoNOfN4K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a66si6492602otc.172.2020.03.30.13.15.50; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=RoNOfN4K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728376AbgC3UPd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:15:33 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:53698 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727437AbgC3UPd (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:15:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/xEbuMGYqmKuHMDUjBVJBLPSd80GP8iW0lTrFNQajdc=; b=RoNOfN4K2vUegOotGDYgeJWEot kv2sgwuqwkdc5K2UiMqswl1k0KhFobQVPqYDpBN1gHj+OKMfQHf2zFSzX+CccW239CJA7UUAoSoat k0Y9FlUx1EB7DiLAspF9mGU0QUMSzK2l8qHFfzi31vRtcMEG4+YKPxYCBTqkzKSHAizc0XvnzoLG7 /m8iClxzCeE2Nos8MRR/rGw3ZxJalgZxDPUmrOQBEs/BOs7jxs/E9C3MCGjpQBUBqbcn+P7/hCsdW tQc1TFa4zMly2KLuX41ajABY/EblsHBIm+ByOXb8n6h2xPznquh5XSfFg5iy1gCBdyfb7lIn8Yjjz FV7mG8Qw==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJ0oF-0006Lj-Kn; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:14:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:14:59 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Kees Cook , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kirill Tkhai , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrei Vagin , Ingo Molnar , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Yuyang Du , David Hildenbrand , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Anshuman Khandual , David Howells , James Morris , Shakeel Butt , Jason Gunthorpe , Christian Kellner , Andrea Arcangeli , Aleksa Sarai , "Dmitry V. Levin" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Infrastructure to allow fixing exec deadlocks Message-ID: <20200330201459.GF22483@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <871rpg8o7v.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <202003282041.A2639091@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 3/29/20 5:44 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:32:35PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > >> Oh, do I understand you right, that I can add a From: in the > >> *body* of the mail, and then the From: in the MIME header part > >> which I cannot change is ignored, so I can make you the author? > > > > Correct. (If you use "git send-email" it'll do this automatically.) > > > > e.g., trimmed from my workflow: > > > > git format-patch -n --to "$to" --cover-letter -o outgoing/ \ > > --subject-prefix "PATCH v$version" "$SHA" > > edit outgoing/0000-* > > git send-email --transfer-encoding=8bit --8bit-encoding=UTF-8 \ > > --from="$ME" --to="$to" --cc="$ME" --cc="...more..." outgoing/* > > > > > > Okay, thanks, I see that is very helpful information for me, and in > this case I had also fixed a small bug in one of Eric's patches, which > was initially overlooked (aquiring mutexes in wrong order, > releasing an unlocked mutex in some error paths). > I am completely unexperienced, and something that complex was not > expected to happen :-) so this is just to make sure I can handle it > correctly if something like this happens again. > > In the case of PATCH v6 05/16 I removed the Reviewd-by: Bernd Edlinger > since it is now somehow two authors and reviewing own code is obviously > not ok, instead I added a Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger (and posted the > whole series on Eric's behalf (after asking Eric's permissing per off-list > e-mail, which probably ended in his spam folder) > > Is this having two Signed-off-by: for mutliple authors the > correct way to handle a shared authorship? If the patch comes through you, then Reviewed-by: is inappropriate. Instead, you should use Signed-off-by: in the second sense of Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst This also documents how to handle "minor changes" that you make.