Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2928833ybb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:17:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs3vEO8ODJ53drbyaEIv4RWeiaPw1WOZyu52DeknqjejAaivdBPLPXNoH1Llq1hgehOBrGT X-Received: by 2002:aca:d7c3:: with SMTP id o186mr308790oig.147.1585610237932; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:17:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585610237; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GZ0PVjlGla3lvT33CskU/l9rTlgW6XgZsDXvQwf9kWZFst7fYc7pKUcTE6D/pJMKGv LSHWxUaD/7rYeSTGR6X/jCxKqfbL6pdFweckpLVZqxqXN074fIrSCrs01mw6ct1YEfQy Dfaqw+NYPhXsavDUafr5w8I/3oKpjzBKuSUFRMvBZ7N/VLedTF0vtR8lAJJyPtfQ767n oTHvVqeUyBKAr24laydTTHUlyBSIxzIumDQgsUJ5QK1BQIS6RwFH+XUstAD2EkBqh3Dd qBgpMR5GD9EnRcKtIylawmlAoszG15Dxjb8FJirVHiHAeqv/ExwVbrAhEiG4d0uviuTA l07g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=MlR6TXRu6PnrEwO4ilmWFc6BB1yLDHaFuGbdE5HXYeU=; b=QdWgBX2rlOS2e9nH9sSSEWRVgs0x+FUzaQvECY1qE6TyS0PSn0M/Sp4ZRKIQa139d+ 7eeCLAi1BBpZmqw0HPwtlKLv3cM4mNZJHb7ALj80yLJtVqQVCdsff8I2PPk2RwXC3h/w 7iVygJW4ayAWIMHDz1A7Q9oGhAh8qM7Ow7Zgipw9UFlnpCfhzyg3ltbSxYDrDIM7WDAJ DYv2n/NuXOO0Mpv0wGAoOb4tTZmGXtuqczsdp0tNWow8pR5ihq9qC50MRxFWb7Vtt7qJ hXO9FG7WkdmMvMBcmxwyulc/y5/IqJ2bnvb7oJg/CjzusXRGv4TQZ+Q+0lFwpy1xA/gJ fMtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=siSm447I; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r25si3861200otq.113.2020.03.30.16.17.03; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=siSm447I; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729285AbgC3XO5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:14:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33282 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728876AbgC3XO5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:14:57 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCF2220409; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:14:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585610096; bh=VVSNPfwNTi/eewRuFYhE6zHWE9KPNO3Iea9w8iAWJQU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=siSm447IUzxXtgfrXMT+dm2UB+eOcmg2IHY8EYAANBKNIAAlzAe3U4hgLktrF2Nl0 Jj+C/sJZu0iMwZ9MwXpCOB6xmTvpUstfmu8CIgfvaT+eJiBiOgkJdKf16h2iNK/hEF 1nUyulakvnSeA5XBjFaYwTfmhRJCU+qwebq1dzVA= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A1ED83523140; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:14:56 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Maddie Stone , Marco Elver , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , kernel-team@android.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/21] list: Comment missing WRITE_ONCE() in __list_del() Message-ID: <20200330231456.GA19865@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20200324153643.15527-1-will@kernel.org> <20200324153643.15527-6-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200324153643.15527-6-will@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:27PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Although __list_del() is called from the RCU list implementation, it > omits WRITE_ONCE() when updating the 'prev' pointer for the 'next' node. > This is reasonable because concurrent RCU readers only access the 'next' > pointers. > > Although it's obvious after reading the code, add a comment. > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon OK, I will take the easy one. ;-) Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney > --- > include/linux/list.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h > index 4d9f5f9ed1a8..ec1f780d1449 100644 > --- a/include/linux/list.h > +++ b/include/linux/list.h > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static inline void list_add_tail(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head) > */ > static inline void __list_del(struct list_head * prev, struct list_head * next) > { > + /* RCU readers don't read the 'prev' pointer */ > next->prev = prev; > WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next); > } > -- > 2.20.1 >