Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751783AbWBWVOg (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:14:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751784AbWBWVOg (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:14:36 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.199]:48697 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783AbWBWVOf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:14:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PVJ76TpAVCTofjJCgFaOdZbkbqdFaQoATh0DoMOQ0Kb5yUzduaa5TmBUuDuYVPdnY13gMUJfzhaGz1bPWr0Wyjhf0tW6I5DnJt3ycUvP9dapf6CyyrcDRR5SHvg4pLC/rL4C58gEjKfWUzrLKjvd88McGuvlTtm8KxUuvIJd3nY= Message-ID: <29495f1d0602231314m6ea84f85wc2792c1b6b7c4715@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:14:34 -0800 From: "Nish Aravamudan" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 Cc: "Gautam H Thaker" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060223210844.GA26701@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <43FE134C.6070600@atl.lmco.com> <20060223205851.GA24321@elte.hu> <29495f1d0602231306o55d759d5v9600b070a4b485e3@mail.gmail.com> <20060223210844.GA26701@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 22 On 2/23/06, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > Would it make more sense to compare 2.6.15 and 2.6.15-rt17, as opposed > > to 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 and 2.6.15-rt17? Seems like the closer the two > > kernels are, the easier it will be to isolate the differences. > > good point. I'd expect there to be similar 'top' output, but still worth > doing for comparable results. I'd also expect little difference (hopefully) -- although there's always an off-chance something big changed somewhere and the problem was fixed in mainline. Just makes the comparison clearer. Thanks, Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/