Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp3260954ybb; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvVvy1w/sM173IPqPjQ6g8t3uJF9zjPBkQs4omAXJ55Goac7S3Y+DPwG/68ccGTu/TILV0g X-Received: by 2002:aca:4142:: with SMTP id o63mr1282576oia.118.1585643294937; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585643294; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mFDdjcJvTZDDXEb98NJjNOWRmoFLegwGa8w2ou3eaT8f3T1+C4RHDt80sqXD3hgcO/ XgIVdl1UQOj2+85oeVorElUJ0C8D8PJf+sy0Adh77xQJCg9TwxvG5RAoccUlfh1ebk3S 3jWM1uPAmOvw8Lmc2wnl5fe5bUClAhsCch9JnERV4a+yqkuZsalE/sYInUGkuU16nyfP +LW7OEGz1Olb4u3VSlYn/T9CXJce4GUJw3WzIFV/x8HG2gbBJdmaUuxwR/ZHUooggntG as46P2LhLjSWkbAET+dfBMW01VK1l7YLidxBF+a64rla4apv81RCPxqP/eFCg2QKYdKD 2Edw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Ue2Vuf/TwfvN4l+tFmTfds0BSKy2QXAYnpV/OFunN4M=; b=Ii93mQe57ND8+AQr/KKcPQhkpHkrzailde8mlvgjU7CoxOi/x9shMwWaNxk4jxRiFA 6No6grjMLrW29R31G3/tHoqG5CNEZzAuOQWIbihWsgAkOYkqbG6q0SOKvEz95EQ5n+zR KPDVVUNPjnCYCSG2JQKCh+9swytmQznOc+nHu0o6Oj8j+e5P3zRiazzTEz5COI0HodUl li7VzGDnAfPlq9EyjPA2TQqr9mvd2CGlZJqxQNxJkQp19JAJfrKDe64bXFVqy2MQtSZT ME4TwJpe18afpnU27n0OAS/B4hYFC7F9mJndZi9oh1BwwgZVIWjxQCC97bvrjJs9TFql 2Z+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r18si1228426otq.124.2020.03.31.01.28.01; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730049AbgCaI0Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:26:24 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.xnet.cz ([178.217.244.18]:23401 "EHLO smtp-out.xnet.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726299AbgCaI0Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:26:24 -0400 Received: from meh.true.cz (meh.true.cz [108.61.167.218]) (Authenticated sender: petr@true.cz) by smtp-out.xnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F26340E6; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (meh.true.cz [local]) by meh.true.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e7874178; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:26:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:26:06 +0200 From: Petr =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0tetiar?= To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: olinuxino: add user red LED Message-ID: <20200331082606.GD21251@meh.true.cz> Reply-To: Petr =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0tetiar?= References: <20200325205924.30736-1-ynezz@true.cz> <20200330175347.r4uam7cybvuxlgog@gilmour.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ynezz/477f6d7a1623a591b0806699f9fc8a27/raw/a0878b8ed17e56f36ebf9e06a6b888a2cd66281b/pgp-key.pub Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chen-Yu Tsai [2020-03-31 09:19:57]: Hi, > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:53 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:59:24PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote: > > > There is a red LED marked as `GPIO_LED1` on the silkscreen and connected > > > to PE17 by default. So lets add this missing bit in the current hardware > > > description. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar > > > > QUeued for 5.8, thanks! > > The gpio-led binding seems to prefer "led-0" up to "led-f" (^led-[0-9a-f]) > as the child node name. This was recently brought to my attention. Do we > want to follow suit here? I can see following in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml: patternProperties: # The first form is preferred, but fall back to just 'led' anywhere in the # node name to at least catch some child nodes. "(^led-[0-9a-f]$|led)": So it seems like `led-0` is indeed preferred, should I send v2 or a new patch as a fix on top of the previous one? -- ynezz