Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] power: supply: smb347-charger: Implement device-tree
 support
To:     Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com>,
        David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@gmail.com>,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, ramakrishna.pallala@intel.com,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200329161552.215075-1-david@ixit.cz>
 <CGME20200329163055epcas1p2cb50a5892440ecff127f87cb4306571e@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20200329162128.218584-6-david@ixit.cz>
 <2dc4e25c-4b3a-1675-1f9e-0437a3526835@samsung.com>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <44ab265e-4a67-bc26-d931-ca7d155171a2@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:20:58 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2dc4e25c-4b3a-1675-1f9e-0437a3526835@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Jonghwa,

31.03.2020 03:25, Jonghwa Lee пишет:
> On 20. 3. 30. 오전 1:21, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> This patch makes smb347 charger driver to support dt binding. All legacy
>> platform data now can be parsed from dt.
>> Because of that smb347 is i2c client driver, IRQ number can be passed
>> automatically through client's irq variable if it is defined in dt.
>> No more to use requesting gpio to irq manually in dt-way.
> Thanks for keeping original commit description and revealing where it 
> comes from.
> 
> Anyway, in the above description, the last three lines doesn't match to 
> the commit since
> 
> the original patch is now split. Please remove them or you can rewrite 
> description as your own.

That's a good suggestion, thank you very much.