Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     boqun.feng@gmail.com, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org (open list:BTRFS FILE SYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Add missing annotation for btrfs_lock_cluster()
Date:   Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:46:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20200331204643.11262-6-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200331204643.11262-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
References: <0/7>
 <20200331204643.11262-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Sparse reports a warning at btrfs_lock_cluster()

warning: context imbalance in btrfs_lock_cluster()
	- wrong count

The root cause is the missing annotation at btrfs_lock_cluster()
Add the missing __acquires(&cluster->refill_lock) annotation.

Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 0163fdd59f8f..9057a5ca6678 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3395,6 +3395,7 @@ static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_lock_cluster(
 		   struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
 		   struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster,
 		   int delalloc)
+	__acquires(&cluster->refill_lock)
 {
 	struct btrfs_block_group *used_bg = NULL;
 
-- 
2.24.1