Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Use
 clk_round_rate_unboundly()
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Electronics
Message-ID: <147b571a-bae1-8a58-942c-579a5297299b@samsung.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:22:45 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/59.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200330231617.17079-5-digetx@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <20200330231617.17079-1-digetx@gmail.com>
        <CGME20200330232025epcas1p37cf026c6e46723d416f94b1f005ac5ab@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
        <20200330231617.17079-5-digetx@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The clk_round_rate() doesn't work for us properly if clock rate is bounded
> by a min/max rate that is requested by some other clk-user because we're
> building devfreq's OPP table based on the rounding.
> 
> In particular this becomes a problem if display driver is probed earlier
> than devfreq, and thus, display adds a memory bandwidth request using
> interconnect API, which results in a minimum clock-rate being set for
> the memory clk. In a result, the lowest devfreq OPP rate is getting
> limited to the minimum rate imposed by the display driver.
> 
> Let's use new clk_round_rate_unboundly() that resolves the problem by
> rounding clock rate without taking into account min/max limits imposed by
> active clk users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> index 28b2c7ca416e..34f6291e880c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset);
>  
> -	rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX);
> +	rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX);
>  	if (rate < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate);
>  		return rate;
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	for (rate = 0; rate <= tegra->max_freq * KHZ; rate++) {
> -		rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate);
> +		rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, rate);
>  
>  		if (rate < 0) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> 

Firstly, patch2 have to be reviewed for this patch.
I have no any objection. It looks good to me.

If patch1 get the confirmation from clock maintainer,
feel free to add my acked tag:
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics