Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] powerpc/watchpoint: Disable all available
 watchpoints when !dawr_force_enable
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     mpe@ellerman.id.au, mikey@neuling.org, apopple@linux.ibm.com,
        paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        jolsa@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20200401061309.92442-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200401061309.92442-9-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <1bef7056-b862-3b20-c3b8-8b161511c60a@c-s.fr>
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:30:16 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1bef7056-b862-3b20-c3b8-8b161511c60a@c-s.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <3042ffeb-0587-79cb-1401-070715d3adb6@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 4/1/20 12:03 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 01/04/2020 à 08:13, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
>> Instead of disabling only first watchpoint, disable all available
>> watchpoints while clearing dawr_force_enable.
> 
> Can you also explain why you change the function name ?

Right. I should have. Will add it in next version.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c | 10 +++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c
>> index 311e51ee09f4..5c882f07ac7d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c
>> @@ -50,9 +50,13 @@ int set_dawr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk, int nr)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> -static void set_dawr_cb(void *info)
>> +static void disable_dawrs(void *info)
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to keep _cb at the end of the function ?

Sure.

Ravi