Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] powerpc/watchpoint: Get watchpoint count
 dynamically while disabling them
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     mpe@ellerman.id.au, mikey@neuling.org, apopple@linux.ibm.com,
        paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        jolsa@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20200401061309.92442-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200401061309.92442-8-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <3c2312bb-9689-830e-3bc8-c828eddf369c@c-s.fr>
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:49:48 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3c2312bb-9689-830e-3bc8-c828eddf369c@c-s.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <299bf5b6-a293-aa59-b27a-04b00ef7ea2c@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 4/1/20 12:02 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 01/04/2020 à 08:13, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
>> Instead of disabling only one watchpoint, get num of available
>> watchpoints dynamically and disable all of them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 15 +++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> index 4e4976c3248b..fae33c729ba9 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> @@ -78,14 +78,13 @@ extern void ptrace_triggered(struct perf_event *bp,
>>               struct perf_sample_data *data, struct pt_regs *regs);
>>   static inline void hw_breakpoint_disable(void)
>>   {
>> -    struct arch_hw_breakpoint brk;
>> -
>> -    brk.address = 0;
>> -    brk.type = 0;
>> -    brk.len = 0;
>> -    brk.hw_len = 0;
>> -    if (ppc_breakpoint_available())
>> -        __set_breakpoint(&brk, 0);
>> +    int i;
>> +    struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0};
> 
> Those declaration should be in the block unsigned them below.
> 
>> +
>> +    if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) {
>> +        for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++)
>> +            __set_breakpoint(&null_brk, i);
>> +    }
> 
> I would have had a preference to the following, but that's detail I guess:
> 
>      int i;
>      struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0};
> 
>      if (!ppc_breakpoint_available())
>          return;
> 
>      for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++)
>          __set_breakpoint(&null_brk, i);

This looks more better. Will change it.

Ravi