Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 61562C433F2
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 06/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Comment
 tcs_is_free() + warn if state mismatch
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     mka@chromium.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
        evgreen@chromium.org, Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
        swboyd@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200311231348.129254-1-dianders@chromium.org>
 <20200311161104.RFT.v2.6.Icf2213131ea652087f100129359052c83601f8b0@changeid>
From:   Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <7a6edff1-3916-e802-0441-25b31989619f@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:08:36 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200311161104.RFT.v2.6.Icf2213131ea652087f100129359052c83601f8b0@changeid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 3/12/2020 4:43 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> tcs_is_free() had two checks in it: does the software think that the
> TCS is free and does the hardware think that the TCS is free.  Let's
> comment this and also add a warning in the case that software and
> hardware disagree, at least for ACTIVE_ONLY TCS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Comment tcs_is_free() new for v2; replaces old patch 6.
>
>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index 9d2669cbd994..93f5d1fb71ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -181,8 +181,27 @@ static void write_tcs_reg_sync(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id,
>    */
>   static bool tcs_is_free(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
>   {
> -	return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use) &&
> -	       read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id);
> +	/* If software thinks it's in use then it's definitely in use */
> +	if (test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* If hardware agrees it's free then it's definitely free */
> +	if (read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id) != 0)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we're here then software and hardware disagree about whether
> +	 * the TCS is free.  Software thinks it is free and hardware thinks
> +	 * it is not.
> +	 *
> +	 * Maybe this should be a warning in all cases, but it's almost
> +	 * certainly a warning for the ACTIVE_TCS where nobody else should
> +	 * be doing anything else behind our backs.  For now we'll just
> +	 * warn there and then still return that we're in use.
> +	 */
> +	WARN(drv->tcs[tcs_id].type == ACTIVE_TCS,
> +	     "Driver thought TCS was free but HW reported busy\n");
This warning can come for borrowed WAKE_TCS as well.
> +	return false;
>   }

We have a patch on downstream variant to optimize this by only checking 
tcs_in_use flag (SW check) and HW check is removed.

  static bool tcs_is_free(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
  {
-       return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use) &&
-              read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id, 0);
+       return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use);
  }

With this we are good and don't require to put above warning as well.

if you want me to upload, i can post it and then you can drop this 
change from your series.

Or if you want to modify it as above and keep in this series i am ok.

Thanks,
Maulik

>   
>   /**

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation