Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp900008ybb; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:42:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL3AeuFT5+8sls4GWRIo5T12276Qbe9KaoETU3mwBtXwxupdq6r+hOJSFaDg/wCd3/50Ha1 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1bee:: with SMTP id k14mr1047862otb.320.1585766555207; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:42:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585766555; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TNnc7HVN2Y7chCIInbQ+sBeaRO+O9NhVdbR+QoJjH5PckEQhyDt3Y/XQDSLpn4L6wQ AtlBRdkrv/61PpVQi7E7TbPzLagSzoru7DIW5KyO8XJNIfjVatY4kDcRpkxe+vD78Gp0 ADEO0CFsWiy0csJ+i1Th4pbD+ai8jWduf0eYFXhJUMtHE0ps6HEnBcEa8FLrocKmafVR BGKEX7chejc5GmAvw8lXNv5YEo9ePxAC1TEiChx4jimnpoNvtSIQhzIv4oAFyWjGXxqo dlU9qPE+ejjqZcLXhQhHE00YBvLxZ5v+2G9mJJa98bHcqBSOTYeVoPNE0Rc45P5xrQdK G+/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=/Iw6IE7RDaKNRYw66RMT8x/ls39j3KZcxzz4IqFMrLs=; b=gDtCa9jH+9lcFrbJ4klmvivnjO/cMvwwVF3LXJB3mFZdU37OEXyeE+g5tSzrIUHMsa s4hYhUneQCVenmdArjIskQ+RxcQXK0iu0padD6x5Xtd5novy49C53crQpw3R6Lo1r4ua D4qCcZK/d+QZPr8RIsElGPjIcHXBCNmgtsdEd2vopons5h3OPn78oCjt/3JdSqf+IIZk M78htpQpvm2txwpuiP5wGhIPhVmZHFBL/BRQjfGysy7woVjhLoZB1/TKsdBPGS5Px83q 3klllpmpirzIH02zjuoGtX3D6B0l5DZtMLh/1ONcXG4I780lH25vo3d7I+vWhlNOgiMj i2vA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x13si1120285oto.105.2020.04.01.11.42.22; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732808AbgDASga (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:36:30 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:37724 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732308AbgDASg3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:36:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2585C11E3C074; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net> To: olteanv@gmail.com Cc: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, robh@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rogerq@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, m-karicheri2@ti.com, kishon@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking support for k3 am65x/j721e soc From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <590f9865-ace7-fc12-05e7-0c8579785f96@ti.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Vladimir Oltean Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:27:04 +0300 > I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch, > after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree > patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did. There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon. There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis.