Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp902554ybb;
        Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLYN1AQ6rLqitMin8O+kIZMboXDBnoSe3wTBgFe4jTT2tBVU/pn8JTjUnrSgfRvNVmhtY3l
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b854:: with SMTP id i81mr3731278oif.22.1585766734129;
        Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585766734; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=ydgUrHGimXvttSYnLf0Sr3D4ViPcJxtIZAmjgoJXpv/GjrEY8mMfM5vHx/LtVOurf6
         ruKBeYmiH91vs4542wJT3ByZcho6z18R84l5HJ3R7mxIafpMFgbNKoZfYOq2QGEEj8sH
         QfgquRRs0L3nOMX0ZyvGOoOkD0HhjmqlLPepcc39gOawved/ilioX8EWhhY5v8m2EJgs
         uqdaLFi4qX5ImWo8atVIC4pmRNHTyGXhOWgwQg6doG8QJJ9OVdFLY4ACLAweTIptpshs
         wVAlsJoIO275QbT50YmWJq6NdRYuDS/NvrGCVBWUWG8FzvQrsEOcCiMd0o/sFB71SeU2
         wu7w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:content-disposition
         :mime-version:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date
         :dkim-signature;
        bh=PRZMQKPDckjJOVOYEhwPGmZ8YcWmxnyQ9ZN7sG50BWg=;
        b=hzkUyFBsbLZfeAhnB8mxi3n4zepIc6YeCozwmW9Ulw3PPgsYmsn0j1XeeWa9qSHCJw
         VofDcder3yq4dBKDO490woe0z3OfdfvYxUXg6ZIsu2jOarXIgwZvT3WWNwCltQHBt1m9
         /31dB+XSDzOJ1iS2oC5u3eQhn4lrQzrh6CHOr/fK34HNRMzYj4ElsxZg9pJq4DD/UjLb
         3nXF6JX32UwyXL6/Yq2MDWwgCbb3FzpSVGjM1gLqENXKizg1g65NtgEvkjIQCoGQMJzN
         JNMZna5zbXol4YF+5LBINS03x8xyrJ7QCUOnLEqLDYmtIymVF4XYohofwIuHbox0qJzU
         68hw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=vXYSv1Xi;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s200si1165839oie.188.2020.04.01.11.45.21;
        Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=vXYSv1Xi;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1732329AbgDASoR (ORCPT <rfc822;jaegeuk-test@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:44:17 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54110 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726640AbgDASoQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:44:16 -0400
Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B403206F5;
        Wed,  1 Apr 2020 18:44:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1585766656;
        bh=dFJJignhfyEupSLh7warErSBQQPjZWEj2LecqCbXml4=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:From;
        b=vXYSv1XizPlHbTVLgM3HbGo81YI/T+ZBDWUo4yyGlaehO4dDtOfa6AjWzItpZms+k
         HwMgiBCkrr/QklDVL91p2TqELtgLbuR3wPdjNOnfredyrJ2DOS/Pgu/yN98BVHVEH1
         ymuI2j/cDLgHGy6E+xYYMXGX7itdGtHFZSq6WxVk=
Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id DD75435226B3; Wed,  1 Apr 2020 11:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date:   Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:44:15 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     urezki@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: What should we be doing to stress-test kfree_rcu()?
Message-ID: <20200401184415.GA7619@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello!

What should we be doing to stress-test kfree_rcu(), including its ability
to cope with OOM conditions?  Yes, rcuperf runs are nice, but they are not
currently doing much more than testing base functionality, performance,
and scalability.

							Thanx, Paul