Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp967103ybb; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJMs0Dk0/k1JCK1hE3cLgthN7pe44z5wjoM8ogl7rV8aUu2nDuk09ZQIJuYyIWFLTFpR74p X-Received: by 2002:aca:af93:: with SMTP id y141mr40518oie.144.1585771300795; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585771300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cb8H0H1ZxGngN2H6ovySVueQ/IB5bQxOUeisayQcuArTDlfWuqrRwACqTyPQ0Ukj2A VXYFINM0g74QAABTkGxl7hpQ7y+6KlYV7Cpa0ufu0xTx4VLjhNKm+meg5+tXSAWpHK/U oyE2LLNKnM3Yuqqseb32fWkc2gQnmWzlD9LIyVNjDvlgwSMYJEPZqI5L5Ej4tXGRzFAi ZkzueUhX/gn7Rl7VTloerXDepx28lkS653sMvrAUgwP1Iu+z9fi/MWlQ5gzj8tHSgYyU +Zakwuim+a717I05q7Dc2huZr5/Mq1o5Y8e+gwsc0e13y6/SjO6FvNEqhnK+pkQgWoPn 5glQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=CMwC7Ow1BhaKidjzqGN+TLI1c7T2E6r0Gwj56dB3pj8=; b=Ma9uUFE1zKU8Sis8BXO1pGD8llfuEYSGud1uEZ/eRtVZS035LDr+UU4/ApykXgjA52 J8ranB38oT0VOS7DD71wHD2oonoxJHvMDWcGhjJNDObxaLG/YbA7xQt3laT79DAwoG15 K9Uy21qUJxv9pIR+FQ+Kr85EIMz4g6RjuCNT9uUAk0sBg0A0GhBwEvYcPQuqyA6hMxPI 3TXHzL6KylYWkWQQqXJrgkPrRpzFbz37GDL6DH+CD6yx48dSCo+0ZODj/CmRYiqqfmAn dqPvzzuULJA1eI2/zc+k66AbHE3rSjANdNLAyLNsUlzOLa1crowQvP1RdG93n4F5K7/A F+fA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z126si1203214oia.187.2020.04.01.13.01.26; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732819AbgDAT6R (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:47038 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732397AbgDAT6Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j17so1491642wru.13 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CMwC7Ow1BhaKidjzqGN+TLI1c7T2E6r0Gwj56dB3pj8=; b=hhebMX3MnvCFW3gNWgPDiwtQUzcBNR97ex07BPxJ6xnx++qF1dQS/ESToYK1Depvsj kbGf46YVbPdyNT7zOebpcr8eU5jG4t5fdVOOA5JuXlx/v4DgOk8BA1ZQ5aER1QUxejv0 Mon2e063NdWHFDRM0gDM/oTZLvyBvli69hRYe/KoEUrdDIIGqSSzMdbVFpj1/A25nMsC vqP61GDF5CTfOZ/94Q0f+xxTL2cUC6pROVzLmf+5T4Ps/jZecRQYZYsHO5EZPnghzoAQ AtuiKcHWF+bFQZaRp/dY7zke6lPQMmNw6yM6rn0cqOdHG1YcEuDi5Qv3j0c9AoENe0Th v8zg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3jvdJZBL84dIZwn6q8+XESb2rIcT8bzswxn5O/3wQTo6tBNDPA Of61yqDBy9Bq8fS4bQ6Xcg4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:b6a5:: with SMTP id j37mr27584519wre.412.1585771094276; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-37-188-180-223.eurotel.cz. [37.188.180.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm4324853wrk.18.2020.04.01.12.58.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:58:12 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Pavel Tatashin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, david@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, sashal@kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: initialize deferred pages with interrupts enabled Message-ID: <20200401195812.GA22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20200401193238.22544-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200401193238.22544-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org btw. Cc Vlastimil On Wed 01-04-20 15:32:38, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > Initializing struct pages is a long task and keeping interrupts disabled > for the duration of this operation introduces a number of problems. > > 1. jiffies are not updated for long period of time, and thus incorrect time > is reported. See proposed solution and discussion here: > lkml/20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com > 2. It prevents farther improving deferred page initialization by allowing > inter-node multi-threading. > > We are keeping interrupts disabled to solve a rather theoretical problem > that was never observed in real world (See 3a2d7fa8a3d5). > > Lets keep interrupts enabled. In case we ever encounter a scenario where > an interrupt thread wants to allocate large amount of memory this early in > boot we can deal with that by growing zone (see deferred_grow_zone()) by > the needed amount before starting deferred_init_memmap() threads. > > Before: > [ 1.232459] node 0 initialised, 12058412 pages in 1ms > > After: > [ 1.632580] node 0 initialised, 12051227 pages in 436ms > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 3c4eb750a199..4498a13b372d 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -1792,6 +1792,13 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > BUG_ON(pgdat->first_deferred_pfn > pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat)); > pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = ULONG_MAX; > > + /* > + * Once we unlock here, the zone cannot be grown anymore, thus if an > + * interrupt thread must allocate this early in boot, zone must be > + * pre-grown prior to start of deferred page initialization. > + */ > + pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > + > /* Only the highest zone is deferred so find it */ > for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) { > zone = pgdat->node_zones + zid; > @@ -1812,8 +1819,6 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > while (spfn < epfn) > nr_pages += deferred_init_maxorder(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn); > zone_empty: > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > - > /* Sanity check that the next zone really is unpopulated */ > WARN_ON(++zid < MAX_NR_ZONES && populated_zone(++zone)); > > @@ -1854,18 +1859,6 @@ deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) > return false; > > pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags); > - > - /* > - * If deferred pages have been initialized while we were waiting for > - * the lock, return true, as the zone was grown. The caller will retry > - * this zone. We won't return to this function since the caller also > - * has this static branch. > - */ > - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&deferred_pages)) { > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > - return true; > - } > - > /* > * If someone grew this zone while we were waiting for spinlock, return > * true, as there might be enough pages already. > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs