Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp991476ybb; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:30:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvjTcDFNzX6X1N2L+0GWvKl7ShAtxZLTFaaaOFXD1KpMB3p4rfimOmE8bjl05cpYje5FpUz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1dfa:: with SMTP id b26mr17512273otj.13.1585773018862; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:30:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585773018; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z/p25ZIp9yx5zo7UHHpcF56g8LZIfXqNhMFYTGOV+Kzl/MtV90Vn4cM9MNBy5Yk/cS 2FkKMYfoOaV8XIbJJPW53PMH4r5c48E2qW0/CANJiZ8TB2Wm6fIW+2Edkcg+tPN0DBcd q2YShlkTAv6EKhYEDGyo0L9zFeFHcIG2Bqa4xshgWxOhsncO59Dl5cAmocZAtb26YEZz EcXJ7RZvbT56u+Zjyongn+3bsH1+oeAMSiVdowzNA/OAPuh2hAenZuls6M3JtvSnL+8L KNKsn1dNhovXX18z3maMlIyDvPY9/lAPJ04FYT9uce37XEd6VuOO/0dEZNOH9qnAHTIV Ldrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=OC9PgTsBjtl+ylJzd7l+Sywlv6FT4l8sZkj2c0W8znk=; b=UAz2+k39kMG2x5er9B5gE9tKN0fboITVdaSdttqjamkimK/Pd65W1io9or+pRWDl7/ xMiig+tXSqJTh5KhrVsK48yKHfwBDVMzqZ26EmHmk1vSGv+dQPxPcXidRDHSHR9GIknc grjwVreZ6zQB0kwuOI92LfpjJ3mqy+5Wh6zCuK3vsotvacGI675hRNjF2Stm++QlxdST N26oaYQ2vZoeDOXZHttlWOMAZx1TJDfHWRBjgcadGLikBRPJm0xkeMpJD+2B6A2jSnL2 8InhPEmgtsxDs828U6wKvMQk6zW8nfvMbaagpWQNvoa2LYjEGzuudmzm9dH9iypIVuvr f8Uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@soleen.com header.s=google header.b=cx66ohga; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u8si1291839ote.311.2020.04.01.13.29.58; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@soleen.com header.s=google header.b=cx66ohga; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732975AbgDAU1q (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:27:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:38596 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732345AbgDAU1q (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:27:46 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id e5so1494737edq.5 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:27:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=soleen.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OC9PgTsBjtl+ylJzd7l+Sywlv6FT4l8sZkj2c0W8znk=; b=cx66ohgaUHaRjaRje4/IRGEh9viPuavu+pjiysUzScydyWXf17BsEL/edlAaWb6gm5 5TPSXQZlaWqNNaGkCW1t4SB7YYkDnUTJdfTAysErd1A0wsdZ/G7bJQ7c6vNRq/ghz/en ZKpsZGdHbwrQXbEKwWfQlkvBY0YkUEudsZRuxkDnQbFsuBL8TyuviKplD7YBowU3Fpbz QKsdw4URzuu50/6+xG36rBq36v2V4Mm4oYOE9F4fwObgfhFGiue9lIlIL0MWI6jcHKXQ lZkN6fQLwifC10Qn8SXS/jaKzzBQ2AYCCBWZ9QtIVPxJXJN3iOEBi5rRSSowSG5hiJqF wbtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OC9PgTsBjtl+ylJzd7l+Sywlv6FT4l8sZkj2c0W8znk=; b=Tm5PRS0JJqAmogSterL+5je4eQTNMtfEw7WpSuNoL3yL+2SxsmcjM2pGo69ImPZ1Me 8qP283OmUvYdXNZLkzY0DtZBH+9qGHdsCu5KmtYDTyaVjpFSLanp+d4ec4TSfZd7WKMC WLpSsrioTJkWV7DS8juoeWOZL/XQFsp1+DiyCzD0gC4ofFTcQAc/0ShIk2OTiUI5NSHq PiJOxewhgDWvoVnik8tTPa2ufsYxdsU+LB1OO+3tN3RtXA9psX2Emii664Vge+DKilZg mQRT8Wtmu2ev3HX9v+phH3UE0pl2DX7j1Qdj+RKYBrnvl3O//xTG2AMrVcJXiHkhvohw 4GoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3npWwEE1xrXZSVFhdF4EL9Nwq8m37PJ8EdEGnHxSuFGsCe6M/Z 55CE7eXSv6q+L2SZs8Gax2OUwUE/KO+4oqcHFr1Ong== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c359:: with SMTP id j25mr22523968edr.85.1585772864144; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:27:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200401193238.22544-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20200401195721.GZ22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20200401195721.GZ22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Pavel Tatashin Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:27:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: initialize deferred pages with interrupts enabled To: Michal Hocko Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Dan Williams , Shile Zhang , Daniel Jordan , Kirill Tkhai , David Hildenbrand , James Morris , Sasha Levin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:57 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 01-04-20 15:32:38, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > Initializing struct pages is a long task and keeping interrupts disabled > > for the duration of this operation introduces a number of problems. > > > > 1. jiffies are not updated for long period of time, and thus incorrect time > > is reported. See proposed solution and discussion here: > > lkml/20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com > > > 2. It prevents farther improving deferred page initialization by allowing > > inter-node multi-threading. > > > > We are keeping interrupts disabled to solve a rather theoretical problem > > that was never observed in real world (See 3a2d7fa8a3d5). > > > > Lets keep interrupts enabled. In case we ever encounter a scenario where > > an interrupt thread wants to allocate large amount of memory this early in > > boot we can deal with that by growing zone (see deferred_grow_zone()) by > > the needed amount before starting deferred_init_memmap() threads. > > > > Before: > > [ 1.232459] node 0 initialised, 12058412 pages in 1ms > > > > After: > > [ 1.632580] node 0 initialised, 12051227 pages in 436ms > > > > Fixes: 3a2d7fa8a3d5 ("mm: disable interrupts while initializing deferred pages") > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin > > I would much rather see pgdat_resize_lock completely out of both the > allocator and deferred init path altogether but this can be done in a > separate patch. This one looks slightly safer for stable backports. This is what I wanted to do, but after studying deferred_grow_zone(), I do not see a simple way to solve this. It is one thing to fail an allocation, and it is another thing to have a corruption because of race. > To be completely honest I would love to see the resize lock go away > completely. That might need a deeper thought but I believe it is > something that has never been done properly. > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko Thank you, Pasha > > Thanks! > > > --- > > mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 3c4eb750a199..4498a13b372d 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -1792,6 +1792,13 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > > BUG_ON(pgdat->first_deferred_pfn > pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat)); > > pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = ULONG_MAX; > > > > + /* > > + * Once we unlock here, the zone cannot be grown anymore, thus if an > > + * interrupt thread must allocate this early in boot, zone must be > > + * pre-grown prior to start of deferred page initialization. > > + */ > > + pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > > + > > /* Only the highest zone is deferred so find it */ > > for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) { > > zone = pgdat->node_zones + zid; > > @@ -1812,8 +1819,6 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > > while (spfn < epfn) > > nr_pages += deferred_init_maxorder(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn); > > zone_empty: > > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > > - > > /* Sanity check that the next zone really is unpopulated */ > > WARN_ON(++zid < MAX_NR_ZONES && populated_zone(++zone)); > > > > @@ -1854,18 +1859,6 @@ deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) > > return false; > > > > pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags); > > - > > - /* > > - * If deferred pages have been initialized while we were waiting for > > - * the lock, return true, as the zone was grown. The caller will retry > > - * this zone. We won't return to this function since the caller also > > - * has this static branch. > > - */ > > - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&deferred_pages)) { > > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > > - return true; > > - } > > - > > /* > > * If someone grew this zone while we were waiting for spinlock, return > > * true, as there might be enough pages already. > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs