Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking
 support for k3 am65x/j721e soc
To:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
CC:     <davem@davemloft.net>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <kishon@ti.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>, <olof@lixom.net>,
        <olteanv@gmail.com>, <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
        <rogerq@ti.com>, <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
References: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net>
 <20200401223500.224253-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
 <20200402094239.GA3770@willie-the-truck>
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Message-ID: <adc2aa08-60e2-cdc3-6b5b-6d96f8805c44@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:05:36 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200402094239.GA3770@willie-the-truck>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 02/04/2020 12:42, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:35:00PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>> I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch,
>>>> after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree
>>>> patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did.
>>>
>>> There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon.
>>>
>>> There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly
>>> I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis.
>>
>> Yep, mainline aarch64-linux-gnu- builds are totally hosed.  DTC fails the build
>> very early on:
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246218
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246270
>> There was no failure in -next, not sure how we skipped our canary in the coal
>> mine.
> 
> Yes, one of the things linux-next does a really good job at catching is
> build breakage so it would've been nice to have seen this there rather
> than end up with breakage in Linus' tree :(
> 
> Was the timing just bad, or are we missing DT coverage or something else?

It seems issue was not caught in -next because the patch that fixes the issue was already in -next
before this series was pushed.

Sorry for the mess again.

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii