Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:08:50 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
        linuxarm@huawei.com, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PPTT: Inform user that table offset used for
 Physical processor node ID
Message-ID: <20200402123501.GA26588@bogus>
References: <1585830145-208714-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1585830145-208714-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

(I see 2 copies of this patch, replying on the latest)

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:22:25PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> If the the Processor ID valid is not set for a Physical Processor Package
> node, then the node table offset is used as a substitute. As such, we
> may get info like this from sysfs:
>
> root@(none)$ pwd
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology
> root@(none)$ more physical_package_id
> 56
>
> Inform the user of this in the bootlog, as it is much less than ideal, and
> they can remedy this in their FW.
>
> This topic was originally discussed in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/c325cfe2-7dbf-e341-7f0f-081b6545e890@huawei.com/T/#m0ec18637d8586f832084a8a6af22580e6174669a
>

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep