Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1933199ybb; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKw68vnMPxxIplFCEr+KXLBVlUz0GqOF3eMFGnj06aq0YvQw6ZrsvyE4o1SgUJxSdpZuKTN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e38:: with SMTP id t24mr3044459otr.125.1585846710745; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585846710; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mDqdFxIRX+hi3Abj8vAf7y198hm9wr1MUCvGohzLDFGQBoevWYF+LX/2u2qlNcj9yR dvoYm/L0PtZFzoflxqzKCVMO6hZUiofCDJBkUCIBm5f9UtZV3DxeHARYhtx7AUN1RuCR blEjGhx6bBZdm4RYUbf3WyyAHr6uykOpFEu+g6fQIYh8B+D2YbGEoHmDgeIZIQ9INr5Q 7/0SYzO1Zox5BF0Oiz94frPyvEdF5Ah9csv8XNSBXb0YPvdZvDYDHaP4wtZBN1d0huRm JqHm3/qnuqrBXULEZBb0qw1Le+6eXvkFXhjRY7J0i7kt5WDg0PaQ+zLs2RWgiienP/Vj iEZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=aCSBYDZXkweitidx5j0j8nD5jlx1bX1bo43+jahDKNM=; b=R9RXitS1zBsji/7ORkNCZhkTL0ONVzLlj4tGYRhllbL5T/Ve4QxhyIcbyiOGmJgOda ATvfEx6BOpI03TGxfN29r80Lt33nEpkHQHjoJ3o81snyNfXL676f4D2xi92su0vFFkXC tWCAqqbY9AU0MBJohqm2u0JwgqKfck6lm3QI40xG2fDdtWrd6NPYy9Pr5MW/e9V8aGkc lDVHit+7Q5dPVcryR+KXPMsxaPRQnN53csW9swITw+gKF3+Mds1JENA1fYVgNx0a10wL x8LBrcjjhPAVcqh3NA0Kf82xcRWXoCe+sZmgIDuJnb2xspAsgt8g5s871xBx5JxXzfxO VpLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11si2467445oii.11.2020.04.02.09.58.18; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389769AbgDBQIX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:08:23 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:35208 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389392AbgDBQIW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:08:22 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2OD-0007Me-0v; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:08:21 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2Nx-00044C-IX; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:08:20 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Alexey Gladkov Cc: LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexander Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Alexey Gladkov , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , David Howells References: <20200327172331.418878-1-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <20200327172331.418878-9-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:05:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200327172331.418878-9-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> (Alexey Gladkov's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:23:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87d08pkh4u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jK2Nx-00044C-IX;;;mid=<87d08pkh4u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19Wu6fmQHfDofF39L0DBA9uLm55GXDDZi0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_20, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% * [score: 0.1157] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Alexey Gladkov X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 9459 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.0 (0.0%), b_tie_ro: 2.8 (0.0%), parse: 0.72 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 2.3 (0.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.77 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.3 (0.0%), tests_pri_-950: 0.94 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.83 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 108 (1.1%), check_bayes: 105 (1.1%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.34 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 89 (0.9%), b_finish: 0.85 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 220 (2.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.64 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.0%), poll_dns_idle: 9101 (96.2%), tests_pri_10: 1.72 (0.0%), tests_pri_500: 9111 (96.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] proc: use human-readable values for hidehid X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexey Gladkov writes: > The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes > difficult to remember what each new magic number means. In principle I like this change. In practice I think you have just broken ABI compatiblity with the new mount ABI. In particular the following line seems broken. > diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c > index dbcd96f07c7a..ba782d6e6197 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/root.c > +++ b/fs/proc/root.c > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ enum proc_param { > > static const struct fs_parameter_spec proc_fs_parameters[] = { > fsparam_u32("gid", Opt_gid), > - fsparam_u32("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), > + fsparam_string("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), > fsparam_string("subset", Opt_subset), > {} > }; As I read fs_parser.c fs_param_is_u32 handles string inputs and turns them into numbers, and it handles binary numbers. However fs_param_is_string appears to only handle strings. It appears to have not capacity to turn raw binary numbers into strings. So I think we probably need to fix fs_param_is_string to raw binary numbers before we can safely make this change to fs/proc/root.c David am I reading the fs_parser.c code correctly? If I am are you ok with a change like the above? Eric