Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:39:44 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Fix checking of IRQ_WORK_LAZY flag set
 on non PREEMPT_RT
Message-ID: <20200402173944.jmztz4vjsepjreye@beryllium.lan>
References: <20200331163453.805082089@goodmis.org>
 <20200331163513.674653275@goodmis.org>
 <20200402172248.GA12483@duo.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200402172248.GA12483@duo.ucw.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Pavel,

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'm currently playing with 4.4.X branch, but I'll eventually test it.
> 
> Is it possible that 4.4.X branch needs similar patch? My code review
> suggests so...

I was waiting for Steven to post the final patch. I'll pick it up for
the next v4.4-rt release.

Thanks,
Daniel