Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:58:27 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        raphael.gault@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability
Message-ID: <20200402175827.kk7su6mo42aa6bh5@treble>
References: <20200327152847.15294-1-jthierry@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200327152847.15294-1-jthierry@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:28:37PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patchset includes some of the least controversial changes that
> were needed as part of the arm64 port [1].
> 
> I'm resending these rebase on top of linux-tip/core/objtool, following
> the addition of Peter's patches [2]
> 
> It consist mostly of small fixes or lifting some limitations to make it
> easier to support a new architecture in objtool. Of course, these will
> not be the only required changes, but these are the ones I hope make
> enough sense to be merged separately from the rest of arm64 port series.
> 
> Changes since v1[3]:
> - Really just rebased things
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/9/643
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/25/807
> [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3453718.html
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Julien

I'm taking everything except 5, 7, and 10.  I'll run them through
testing and then send them along to the tip maintainers.  Thanks!

-- 
Josh