Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932670AbWBYElf (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932671AbWBYEle (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:34 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35000 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932670AbWBYElW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:22 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Johannes Stezenbach Subject: Re: Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD? Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:27:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Dmitry Torokhov , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, Zwane Mwaikambo , Samuel Masham , Jan Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk References: <20060214152218.GI10701@stusta.de> <20060223204110.GE6213@redhat.com> <20060225015722.GC8132@linuxtv.org> In-Reply-To: <20060225015722.GC8132@linuxtv.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602250527.03493.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1161 Lines: 29 On Saturday 25 February 2006 02:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:59:37PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > And if the option is mostly useless, what is it good for? > > > > It's sometimes useful in cases where the target CPU doesn't have any better > > option (Speedstep/Powernow). The big misconception is that it > > somehow saves power & increases battery life. Not so. > > All it does is 'not do work so often'. The upside of this is > > that in some situations, we generate less heat this way. > > Doesn't less heat imply less power consumption? Not in this case no. > P4 clockmod certainly sucks compared to Speedstep, > but IMHO it is still potentially useful for the average > desktop PC user (at least those many who let their PCs > run 24/7, but 90% idle and unused). I don't think so no. The latencies make it unusable. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/