Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932665AbWBYElN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932670AbWBYElN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:13 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:5335 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932665AbWBYElM (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:41:12 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: don't use early_printk() during memory init Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:26:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel References: <200602242049_MC3-1-B938-400B@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200602242049_MC3-1-B938-400B@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602250526.06389.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 712 Lines: 18 On Saturday 25 February 2006 02:45, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > printk is working by the time this memory init message prints. > As it stands, output jumps to the top of the screen and prints > this message, then back to normal boot messages, overwriting > a line at the top. Using of early_printk here was intentional because it needs much less infrastructure than printk and is pretty good proof that the kernel at least started. So please don't apply the patch. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/