Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932419AbWBYG7R (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:59:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932406AbWBYG7Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:59:16 -0500 Received: from ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au ([203.59.1.198]:36172 "EHLO mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932378AbWBYG7P (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:59:15 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,145,1139155200"; d="scan'208"; a="626317469:sNHT385531682" Message-ID: <44000036.7070403@eyal.emu.id.au> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:59:02 +1100 From: Eyal Lebedinsky Organization: Eyal at Home User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Milan Kupcevic CC: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_promise: Port enumeration order - SATA 150 TX4, SATA 300 TX4 References: <43FFAE3D.7010002@physics.harvard.edu> In-Reply-To: <43FFAE3D.7010002@physics.harvard.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 37 Milan Kupcevic wrote: > From: Milan Kupcevic > > Fix Promise SATAII 150 TX4 (PDC40518) and Promise SATA 300 TX4 > (PDC40718-GP) wrong port enumeration order that makes it (nearly) > impossible to deal with boot problems using two or more drives. > > Signed-off-by: Milan Kupcevic > --- > > The current kernel driver assumes: > > port 1 - scsi3 > port 2 - scsi1 > port 3 - scsi0 > port 4 - scsi2 I totally agree with the fact that the Linux driver gets the ports wrong when compared to the BIOS, Windows and surely contradicts the port numbers printed on the board. I doubt we all got samples on the one bad batch... It *is* a real problem and if the solution is correct then I support it. Maybe we need a quick feedback from current users: do you guys find that the ports are detected as they are labelled (white silk screen) on the board or do they show up out of order (as listed above by Milan)? -- Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) attach .zip as .dat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/