Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2282540ybb; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL5iueTR2DTLk8ByU8A+fSgLaWK4Bt2hVYF4kXZ3U1aWD50fIWobN/Qqjeyv7+WIbgitbCk X-Received: by 2002:a4a:da03:: with SMTP id e3mr4904274oou.4.1585872987666; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:16:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585872987; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HnduGjeHTqDvbS/6E60bSolOjOHFBuwEkv3xKei5ley7XGhECDerHjZ7yEG2H9q7Z4 dT3gtHtPY2f+drOl20FfLeQhyDLcwahpDyhBbcfn8h2wE7GxRF+7FUjDxgmuuknK/7T2 ysx9FhiRH9Yoeh2TqIZuzfNaszm8WW5F27hXKJHdqfO1hVCRYgn0QvfzsthKmpRvLRul A0hQwwL1sCar/ReY41SilM7nh+9zFzHKSu809+bKOGkS8pXSIAFNAB9sZBAvukHtnp+Y FsXwbA8yZv2cJCrCCOFLLZsZ0W7r8IPvWaw0zXcicpVK9eocXEMBAdSfD5lVaW910s1d aElw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=3gogx7cKtuZn/Jj69MSlTu1KWxR0vQYnZOxtRP8VbQA=; b=iDn9ea1nSlEbwO7txF+o8euCDmanS8CwKiVXqsHrgYbIsgFLa6BdeuaBV1ztz6wgEu qTPWuJl75YEWhTQCiT/GlrKAWz7HB80EzJlGKLQIEPt25LA9kcHYy5sr5Z2bB87u7lVm uRag27kSRPkChPs9xF9mamDf2xssAgwU7jkWBsrUVaF3w/x4s6dDW7sPNPhG44IP+qUR tWJy+HAxzrjdnd1UytfJYYt9lFtWsjwMr7O29cU+OJnBsAKbqQ0gSeQP5egCvTCk1awQ Z1K6LdMuejRckkNX2loheitK7n3vmw+VRv7RB0uUKF3HzyKL6edHSedxPcKLctHfGpsN SOYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1si3115124otn.91.2020.04.02.17.16.09; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389171AbgDBXOv (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:14:51 -0400 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.36]:41550 "EHLO out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731783AbgDBXOu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:14:50 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R181e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07425;MF=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TuS6Uln_1585869285; Received: from US-143344MP.local(mailfrom:yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TuS6Uln_1585869285) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:14:48 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: don't need drain lru cache when splitting and mlocking THP To: Daniel Jordan Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, hughd@google.com, aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1585337380-97368-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <20200402230411.7ckwkmd6wwtqfkm2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> From: Yang Shi Message-ID: <6cca9634-02c6-03fc-eeb2-9a4d54441ee1@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:14:44 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200402230411.7ckwkmd6wwtqfkm2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/2/20 4:04 PM, Daniel Jordan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 03:29:40AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: >> Since the commit 8f182270dfec ("mm/swap.c: flush lru pvecs on compound >> page arrival") THP would not stay in pagevec anymore. So the >> optimization made by commit d965432234db ("thp: increase >> split_huge_page() success rate") doesn't make sense anymore, which tries >> to unpin munlocked THPs from pagevec by draining pagevec. >> >> And draining lru cache before isolating THP in mlock path is unnecessary >> either. > Can we get some of that nice history in this part too? > > Draining lru cache before isolating THP in mlock path is also unnecessary. > b676b293fb48 ("mm, thp: fix mapped pages avoiding unevictable list on mlock") > added it and 9a73f61bdb8a ("thp, mlock: do not mlock PTE-mapped file huge > pages") accidentally carried it over after the above optimization went in. Thanks for finding out this, I didn't dig that far. Will add it into v2. > >> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov >> Cc: Hugh Dickins >> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli >> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > Since we don't mlock pte-mapped THP, it seems these huge pages wouldn't ever be > in the pagevecs if I'm understanding it all. Yes, it is correct. > > Saves lines and some amount of overhead and lru contention, so looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan Thanks.