Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp105545ybb; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 22:12:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJObwJ96uorUYrQYHSG7uzAHWizV+qAeKfnk3ypXz4vQmSP8g+tuMJN0z4ufLNis66cokJ5 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:103:: with SMTP id b3mr1917203oie.46.1585890755670; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:12:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585890755; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DVDIDpRhwMvv9TAyVYCB0tMPXHKr2hh6MnW7en6v+xG70C9eDQhR7a0U3tQLXisy95 H+LE+gpOHa+i56hfNRJNlBH7uP6RCG8JM7ZfNamQrTtmfQZ8U9/mnjpf1VxiBepVxffH 6Nx0LmcdAVH/j7rc1ei6jYMavV6GniwbG2x1ihGYCw+lwQB7CzlmgptWSESqIdU9zrEB nV5FzJ6cwDen0eCC8+BKHQLe/OHzfV4fizipSZp6YXJPY4LByv6lTUx5ou/qfNcyo2bG GBJiB7/d9zl8//3aAArFJ3XphQryAF3ljwJB2OdDLyBnDc/oKQupx64aqPgJ5OaEYNQ4 rTHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=jofktekZwJmynwAp+73dh/VN6DTrbyAH++7Gc/JbF2c=; b=O1gCYhn6W3hr355uSmfwMh2H3p7CamtaHHmd/Azq0i8uRcq/cfANhpytpx4wPby+Oc oO6kSAy/oKSRunroOtBKbpbdHpX4biY2ZiRApLdW7N99ZWaf659bb9vI1Dzb5n0Jmyxi YAqtnxZNZYiZSemK4sFxWGzyU7tMpXf81kXRWdtWnZlSldeVO17wYpicc6+Im7DgzLvh s8GnsaVTGVoQUOZOrHwGxzm7cVBhOEIUW0Q6vjuGudflO7hAlLIWsRjNrZdzfjm2nnna nA4Z7iFcVyvmFB0r9AE8TwTqNmrOaZpdW9T3ejrMD0Xwg2QX6ZVCT0sTa7rUfuuyNwHt 10Tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=dyRE1GZp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n1si3723549otf.299.2020.04.02.22.12.21; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=dyRE1GZp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731040AbgDCFME (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:12:04 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:56558 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726343AbgDCFMD (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:12:03 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0335BmNs071109; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:11:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585890708; bh=jofktekZwJmynwAp+73dh/VN6DTrbyAH++7Gc/JbF2c=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=dyRE1GZpuDhhxymx4cHTF/J5WNzncrW1a9rh/0gJcmwGMKWXhQvXZ056vLZNYiOBh IU1hnyhT/djvFb7+LGb07eqkOx++BJ99CokPud4r3arsgzE8zKeOU5aTFBPWMsCTBR 6moFnRAwIx61s/1mT2YeJVkp24XPxaxpUAfmIxMY= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0335Bm4u097176 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:11:48 -0500 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:11:48 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:11:48 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.198] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0335Bg4R055217; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:11:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking support for k3 am65x/j721e soc To: Nick Desaulniers , Grygorii Strashko CC: Will Deacon , "David S. Miller" , Arnd Bergmann , , , Jakub Kicinski , Linux ARM , LKML , , Network Development , Olof Johansson , , , Rob Herring , , , clang-built-linux References: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net> <20200401223500.224253-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20200402094239.GA3770@willie-the-truck> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <818261f1-0075-94ee-f73b-3f72a058999f@ti.com> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:41:42 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/04/20 10:57 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Grygorii Strashko > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 02/04/2020 12:42, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:35:00PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>>>>> I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch, >>>>>> after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree >>>>>> patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did. >>>>> >>>>> There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon. >>>>> >>>>> There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly >>>>> I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis. >>>> >>>> Yep, mainline aarch64-linux-gnu- builds are totally hosed. DTC fails the build >>>> very early on: >>>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246218 >>>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246270 >>>> There was no failure in -next, not sure how we skipped our canary in the coal >>>> mine. >>> >>> Yes, one of the things linux-next does a really good job at catching is >>> build breakage so it would've been nice to have seen this there rather >>> than end up with breakage in Linus' tree :( >>> >>> Was the timing just bad, or are we missing DT coverage or something else? >> >> It seems issue was not caught in -next because the patch that fixes the issue was already in -next >> before this series was pushed. >> >> Sorry for the mess again. > > No worries, it's just worthwhile to study failures. So IIUC, in this case: > mainline was 5.6 > the broken patch was merged in 5.7 merge window > a fix was already in -next, but not slated for the new merge window. > (Maybe scheduled for 5.8?) No, the "fix" is scheduled to go into v5.7 kernel as well. It is here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kristo/linux tags/ti-k3-soc-for-v5.7 This is already part of ARM SoC tree, and slated for v5.7 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git/log/?h=arm/dt Arnd, Olof, Can you please help by either queuing the arm/dt entirely or just the K3 SoC parts to Linus sooner than later? Thanks, Sekhar