Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030218AbWBYLTI (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:19:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030220AbWBYLTH (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:19:07 -0500 Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.44]:51588 "EHLO vms044pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030218AbWBYLTG (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:19:06 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:19:04 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection In-reply-to: <20060225105340.GA23643@infradead.org> To: Christoph Hellwig , James Ketrenos , NetDev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-to: gene.heskett@verizononline.net Message-id: <200602250619.04567.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: Organization? Absolutely zip. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <43FF88E6.6020603@linux.intel.com> <200602250549.47547.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <20060225105340.GA23643@infradead.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2335 Lines: 47 On Saturday 25 February 2006 05:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:49:47AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> As someone (a broadcast engineer with 40+ years of carrying what >> used to be a 1st phone) obviously more familiar with the FCC R&R >> than you apparently are, Christoph, I'll have to argue that point. > >Please stop spreading the bullshit. Please quote the FCC regulation > on this. Its not "bullshit" as you so "eloquently" put it, Christoph. As for looking it up, I'd imagine your ability to run a search engine at fcc.gov exceeds mine. Hint, its probably in the section called "Rules that apply to all". These rules go back to about the time of when they outlawed any transmit tunability in CB radios in the later 70's, so its not a new item by any means as its just an extension of that edict to cover this newer technology. The fact that it effectively put a stop to conference call type use of single sideband because no 2 radios were on the same, now non-adjustable frequency was an undesirable thing, but thats the breaks. I might try and look it up after I've had some zz's, as I just came from doing transmitter maintainance overnight. >> So basicly, you can accept it with the wrappers Intel provides, or >> linux will not have access to the use of these devices, any of them >> that fit in the category of "software radios". > >We have support for other software radios. If intel doesn't do the > right thing support for their hardware will have to wait until > someone has reverse-engineered their daemon [1]. > >[1] they disallow it in their license, but that's completely void in > many countries. I don't think you'll find that to be the case here in the states. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/