Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp365261ybb; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 04:19:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL2hbPPedvdt1MHbA2uoTmbt3mSFOIM0Pgj9g6v6pIb1xFOk6mAwNY77uY/lbZxshFW7Cq2 X-Received: by 2002:aca:c78d:: with SMTP id x135mr2428826oif.51.1585912746032; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:19:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585912746; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e2d+uH5Kj0gLcquHrKGq52tK0NcaU09XF+qQ/nlrbZ7IKvKr7m+b6Vk0lkSdy7LhmF iDvt0nhuSnU3OCRPRR50l7ideVP1JC1eb18uovjSDBIBuhe/tBhL5pis3hqmBlaNSNxE RCvChO5UvuzDKlq0jM0rxc/wHcu/9XLM3AbuTcp8LLNE5SsVdfV2bqZq/xo+Ggn6NMVB QztiK1WZ6SQ65LOPEDTy4GT2qDfxjz5nzOrNy8XV7ncATt+ziJSRF7xSUd+pDND2XQsc bNa3/G1PLONpAVDjrRDaiplWPTYWjaXZij5Pl4QRnlkGDSuPiY74A8nyGRJnKLI0VZ04 Dz6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ISVzqUmQ866jYmYCkDXX5w/QpTIHn/we7n1ERZB+Kuw=; b=Z1GYUSyiBNDt4g7a2mv679Xd7Q1kHb4SGedoljxsmwG67t89buz5xNPvb/YH6C3ctr Japy1NXrCqko1FX0fpBiWAsc8UGhjtnHeO4XHmbx104XFheFyc2b3+veakEwSFWV+djt rKKzYmiggSZSAyOF+j0frtXhKZkaZ2jf/kozt26SN69flhqwPShBCQwIa8zSHGwFPrzw XZIXq+SPy1GFHIrPcjv0sxBjn3zosHZ9H6JxvvBbqRwxBg8kd4d21zJ/k1Ak508bVx84 lRdG1Av7oFjfZn5tZde8alTFRZLJfnlMnEPgsaOx3Yblp7w6ZxhVWGXEE1O1PAbDTQke vezw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lca.pw header.s=google header.b=LgA8VW7Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j12si3635481otq.21.2020.04.03.04.18.53; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lca.pw header.s=google header.b=LgA8VW7Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390745AbgDCLSL (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:18:11 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:38505 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728099AbgDCLSL (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:18:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id z12so6070129qtq.5 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:18:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ISVzqUmQ866jYmYCkDXX5w/QpTIHn/we7n1ERZB+Kuw=; b=LgA8VW7YC5BY0sYCtnyBUf/lF8zI0Bs2aodjntYad6Sfxftp1gThUrQcNP1PPzNnF+ PRFW2uEWaFgCXah6EYMDaNfX69h2ELki+CZcY9V61mw4i5ULXA+47XfHUzcb4yv0CYGQ ar5Gd99PP2KDmnKvcEZ7mm48biCkm+yz5Asjv2qUP5aHDe4ZYkNPQ3KS5uncPRdCk2Wo 5/deUOGZEk3ZUyK4I2MMf5+CyuLeJPM5dMPP/yrg5oTQA8oFUXyDmPmzEe15R9py3Jhw MBnCC+e6RbXWQuCA7YQ7So1M1+2Xs+RiBmiXvOADrRdRzy1Zvvq8vuvjI1lOiL1qq28L vAQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ISVzqUmQ866jYmYCkDXX5w/QpTIHn/we7n1ERZB+Kuw=; b=ndeIi6EcymYr7g5GIv1qMs6vM+qkjLDIFkJL97xITB3qdkwY5AZJqEICCrnMOD8heu In0xynl40lySzvy6yBdE/fgsYvjxMQqF1pDGyBilcuWwmmwDY+RxWF3pY8lLBugcZ5SK WmpH1u5C4Kq4NCt1XxCkd/0jEIMIA8ROjggFd5OVxUYtg80xzgU5bw7qo3ia9DOfTTUD lbyyJdE7Iog2as3ki7b9VbC2MXmQ5wfHRde9EZivjRTcS4syIjkAc16/Yjg+mPbtNmlG Mz+eHlATSnbCcPA6nsbuEVjgrOu/ixBsmA24TlMi9/hbbYlUJucQv+TbE4KhJj4Qfp09 zpPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubA+/IIStIR3iLdie5IdtcnBfO5phAaANAB2mEBtpX4meeGVrDY iq6/WrCa6aWn9OU9YrfGwaIL/w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6f63:: with SMTP id u3mr7573143qtv.365.1585912689344; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.153] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s188sm6096679qkh.67.2020.04.03.04.18.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi: fix a deadlock with cpu hotplug From: Qian Cai In-Reply-To: <2025426.V7fFeAKXnt@kreacher> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:18:07 -0400 Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , lenb@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, the arch/x86 maintainers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0277E081-1807-4393-BB8D-8E851D3ED1C7@lca.pw> References: <20200329142109.1501-1-cai@lca.pw> <2025426.V7fFeAKXnt@kreacher> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Apr 3, 2020, at 5:29 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki = wrote: >=20 > On Sunday, March 29, 2020 4:21:09 PM CEST Qian Cai wrote: >> Similar to the commit 0266d81e9bf5 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu = hotplug >> deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): >>=20 >> "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from = the >> hotplug thread associated with that CPU. >>=20 >> It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because >> the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. >>=20 >> Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU = and >> invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." >>=20 >> Since CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR (for cstate.c) selects >> CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS (for processor_throttling.c) on x86, just >> make call_on_cpu() a static inline function from = processor_throttling.c >> and use it in cstate.c. >>=20 >> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: >> ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: = __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 >>=20 >> but task is already holding lock: >> ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: = cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 >>=20 >> which lock already depends on the new lock. >>=20 >> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: >>=20 >> -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: >> cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 >> irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 >> __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 >> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 >> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 >> pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] >> pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] >> local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 >> work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 >> process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 >> worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 >> kthread+0x1f4/0x220 >> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 >>=20 >> -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: >> __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 >> lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 >> __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 >> work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 >> acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 >> acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 >> acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 >> acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 >> acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 >> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 >> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 >> smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 >> kthread+0x1f4/0x220 >> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 >>=20 >> other info that might help us debug this: >>=20 >> Chain exists of: >> (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock >>=20 >> Possible unsafe locking scenario: >>=20 >> CPU0 CPU1 >> ---- ---- >> lock(cpuidle_lock); >> lock(cpuhp_state-up); >> lock(cpuidle_lock); >> lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); >>=20 >> *** DEADLOCK *** >>=20 >> 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: >> #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: = cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 >> #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: = cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 >> #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: = cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 >>=20 >> Call Trace: >> dump_stack+0xa0/0xea >> print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c >> check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 >> __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 >> lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 >> __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 >> work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 >> acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 >> acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 >> acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 >> acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 >> acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 >> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 >> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 >> smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 >> kthread+0x1f4/0x220 >> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai >> --- >>=20 >> v2: >> Make call_on_cpu() a static inline function to avoid a compilation >> error when ACPI_PROCESSOR=3Dm thanks to lkp@intel.com. >>=20 >> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 7 ------- >> include/acpi/processor.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c = b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c >> index caf2edccbad2..49ae4e1ac9cd 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c >> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int = cpu, >>=20 >> /* Make sure we are running on right CPU */ >>=20 >> - retval =3D work_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, = cx); >> + retval =3D call_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, = cx, >> + false); >> if (retval =3D=3D 0) { >> /* Use the hint in CST */ >> percpu_entry->states[cx->index].eax =3D cx->address; >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c = b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c >> index 532a1ae3595a..a0bd56ece3ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c >> @@ -897,13 +897,6 @@ static long __acpi_processor_get_throttling(void = *data) >> return pr->throttling.acpi_processor_get_throttling(pr); >> } >>=20 >> -static int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg, bool = direct) >> -{ >> - if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu =3D=3D = smp_processor_id())) >> - return fn(arg); >> - return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg); >> -} >> - >> static int acpi_processor_get_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr) >> { >> if (!pr) >> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h >> index 47805172e73d..770d226b22f2 100644 >> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h >> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h >> @@ -297,6 +297,16 @@ static inline void = acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx >> } >> #endif >>=20 >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS >=20 > Why does this depend on CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS? call_on_cpu() was only used in processor_throttling.c which has, processor-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS) +=3D processor_throttling.o after this patch, it will also be used in cstate.c which has, ifneq ($(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR),) obj-y +=3D cstate.o endif i.e., config ACPI_PROCESSOR tristate "Processor" depends on X86 || IA64 || ARM64 select ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE select ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS if X86 || IA64 Therefore, call_on_cpu() is only used when CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=3Dy. The #ifdef is rather a safe net that in the future, if we decided to = make call_on_cpu() a non-inline function, it will prevent triggering an compilation = warning for unused function when CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=3Dn. It may also serve as a documentation purpose to indicate that function = is only used with CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=3Dy. >=20 >> +static inline int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void = *arg, >> + bool direct) >> +{ >> + if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu =3D=3D = smp_processor_id())) >> + return fn(arg); >> + return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg); >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> /* in processor_perflib.c */ >>=20 >> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ