Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Hyunki Koo" <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
To:     "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc:     <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene@kernel.org>,
        "'Jiri Slaby'" <jslaby@suse.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200403104744.GA29385@kozik-lap>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] tty: samsung_tty: 32-bit access for TX/RX hold
 registers
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:12:55 +0900
Message-ID: <005601d609a8$d3243710$796ca530$@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQKEs4Y1dkf1SYeuuA/6Ie9wROds5QGozxKaAhmfaBwBVB8GPabhL5wA
Content-Language: ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 102P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <20200401082721.19431-1-hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
        <CGME20200403102049epcas2p1d1fe95160b7f37609a8b1710c196cdd8@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
        <20200403102041.22015-1-hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
        <20200403104744.GA29385@kozik-lap>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 7:48:38PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:20:41PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote:
> > Support 32-bit access for the TX/RX hold registers UTXH and URXH.
> >
> > This is required for some newer SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > v3: change rd_regl to rd_reg in line 954 for backward compatibility.
> 
> I cannot find this change against v2.
Okay, I will add all changes.
> 
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 76
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > index 73f951d65b93..a674a80163ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > @@ -154,12 +154,47 @@ struct s3c24xx_uart_port {  #define
> > portaddrl(port, reg) \
> >  	((unsigned long *)(unsigned long)((port)->membase + (reg)))
> >
> > -#define rd_regb(port, reg) (readb_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg)))
> > +static unsigned int rd_reg(struct uart_port *port, int reg)
> 
> You should return here u32 to be consistent with readl_relaxed.
> 
> > +{
> > +	switch (port->iotype) {
> > +	case UPIO_MEM:
> > +		return readb_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg));
> > +	case UPIO_MEM32:
> > +		return readl_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg));
> > +	default:
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #define rd_regl(port, reg) (readl_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg)))
> >
> > -#define wr_regb(port, reg, val) writeb_relaxed(val, portaddr(port,
> > reg))
> > +static void wr_reg(struct uart_port *port, int reg, int val)
> 
> val should be u32.
Okay, I will apply it.
> 
> > +{
> > +	switch (port->iotype) {
> > +	case UPIO_MEM:
> > +		writeb_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg));
> > +		break;
> > +	case UPIO_MEM32:
> > +		writel_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg));
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  #define wr_regl(port, reg, val) writel_relaxed(val, portaddr(port,
> > reg))
> >
> > +static void write_buf(struct uart_port *port, int reg, int val)
> 
> buf is misleading, you do not write here any buffer. Maybe
> "wr_reg_barrier()" or "wr_reg_order()"?
Okay, wr_reg_barrier  would be good, I will apply it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof