Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] soc: aspeed: Add XDMA engine driver
To:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
References: <20200402194955.16643-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com>
 <8ca08ea0-2f3e-4b44-a595-bfe96ca02b3f@www.fastmail.com>
From:   Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <d1fe0157-8a4b-f0f5-f0e4-443d6f4e3e4a@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:52:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8ca08ea0-2f3e-4b44-a595-bfe96ca02b3f@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 4/2/20 7:32 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, at 06:19, Eddie James wrote:
>> This series adds a driver to control the Aspeed XDMA engine embedded in the
>> AST2500 and AST2600. The XDMA engine performs automatic DMA operations
>> over PCI-E between the Aspeed SOC (acting as a BMC) and a host processor.
>>
>> Changes since v6:
>>   - See individual patches
> v7 is not an evolution on v6 - v7 contains a bunch of bugs that v6 fixed (at least
> wrt locking). How did you generate this series?


My goodness, I could have sworn that was v6. I took the series that was 
merged in the openbmc kernel. Must have gotten mixed up. -_-


>
> Also my name is misspelled in each of the Reviewed-by: tags which makes me
> think that something has gone quite wrong with the posting of v7, and I'm
> concerned that this was based on e.g. v5 but with my tags against v6 applied.


Well thats because I added them manually since they had "disappeared" or 
so I thought from v6 during the application to openbmc... guess that 
should have been a warning sign

>
> Andrew