Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:25:02 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@lists.01.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()
Message-ID: <20200403182502.woqrxpydt3n6l6ie@linutronix.de>
References: <20200327074308.GY11705@shao2-debian>
 <20200327175350.rw5gex6cwum3ohnu@linutronix.de>
 <20200327232959.rpylymw2edhtxuwr@linutronix.de>
 <20200403174500.75rwuijdri5ewl5c@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200403174500.75rwuijdri5ewl5c@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-04-03 13:45:00 [-0400], Daniel Jordan wrote:
> Why would preemption prevent it?  Interrupts are still enabled.
> 
> What am I missing?  :-)

Preemption is disabled which means no other task is allowed to be
scheduled.

Sebastian