Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 19:49:29 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
        nstange@suse.de, mhocko@suse.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] block: address blktrace use-after-free
Message-ID: <20200403194929.GZ11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
References: <20200402000002.7442-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <20200403081929.GC6887@ming.t460p>
 <15236c59-6b48-2fcf-1a84-f98cb8b339ab@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15236c59-6b48-2fcf-1a84-f98cb8b339ab@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:13:47AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-04-03 01:19, Ming Lei wrote:
> > BTW, Yu Kuai posted one patch for this issue, looks that approach
> > is simpler:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200324132315.22133-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> 
> That approach is indeed simpler but at the expense of performing dynamic
> memory allocation in a cleanup path, something I'm not enthusiast about.

I also think that its important to annotate that there are actually two
issues here. Not one. One is the misuse of debugfs, the other is how
the deferral exposed the misuse and complications of its misuse.

  Luis