Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp887701ybb; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI87FSic8CY8O6oOTpm827RVNtYD1PxSNj2dgKudvVs8wyh/Aa9Yd8VmHex7nNBNjE0GgJj X-Received: by 2002:aca:4bc5:: with SMTP id y188mr4718925oia.9.1585946912107; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585946912; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Nu8YKgky9IRyzxtgiTP1w/nj3dit7zQEZwosPzj9VWE5gzvtnlj5cgFpaMTFYKGGsj YAj/nWlY9chXp+WrvcfDzMPVkL602VXcDQ5yD6adqu2YTXJhS8M7Dlg2dJoTuDF01+oi dIPbu5Yva9QScIU19vN9M0epQVpRvJBzbcgFVkeAuYvOyRMQhexMsmJbZX3w0JaX44RK ow0GBvvOrkmROEJnFYcGdKskAbbP8mjHZCuunTHUSLtr4BKmChTi+2nB6WfuHyoYdbGe +e10Lm4CCdJOuItw1R3namr+zEBBa6OGClO6Det4CkykabIXOhWCM43zXRbVn9jPeM7O sHKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=D0yShZZqS3ig+9P83cMBawyVNi4rJKSPYw7X8mQyzFQ=; b=Yr+o3WhMFu6AmY2V9kiJNza6OriNr/yeVkm5rZFTmcq50gQ4CM8VIS7tt0+N6tcB9c KXvdJD/ALEGSaxQqgS6aIHkMNH7btQZ30GN+3AoxJuPSt51m5lDGMIa5tTH9YCNOmq6f E9LDYYZH3+0R1RJ3ZMjvPRHku4MJbCpTotUTfuWVtQZIw04IGPuQKFQ2FROnxMuFa1ux Q3lYF/piqXJDbtpbez1dORWN+xo3IKw1jQMtNvyWejQ3UiRAd7P1E9wPJJ7zlXdBB7hq FvY60l8FTr1K1dae8baWLEjA1wmdJJ31NSaC+L5L7ZQQxWwla9D1FV1P8AiNT3os/0ey 8DoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-amdcloud-onmicrosoft-com header.b="3m4yPP/T"; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=amd.com dkim=pass dkdomain=amd.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=amd.com); spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23si4348297oih.275.2020.04.03.13.48.18; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector2-amdcloud-onmicrosoft-com header.b="3m4yPP/T"; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=amd.com dkim=pass dkdomain=amd.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=amd.com); spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727924AbgDCUru (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:47:50 -0400 Received: from mail-mw2nam10on2063.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.94.63]:52416 "EHLO NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726368AbgDCUru (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:47:50 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=M1miY3ezRgtb2GBBHi8+AJ49wxrsxRKveltPmFSgJs9SI5IbECU2x0wA2U14Uklsudv+dpqKurp17XrUrATduFqVfUQlp7+viRoGciYZDRapkmKYclJqdm1sjEUtDuHwHWegQVkOaI/vQFc8ig9eZjs/puvk3kacXWQCaekk7VeyQftKKOTvGluEpSpsgB9d9MqJh9IIjzu7Q5WaOLjMIjES7iA+UN4Ww+wgyNHie2Et0PpcDbWrlbmB0cQcrOun9SBUZ/kKZZ7mt/7Cz8fRu3M4ALjZoFdfc53/LAMCw4JHW2dqXhkN6eAzDD6GRw17N0Y/cpDA2NqN0BcGMKFAXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=D0yShZZqS3ig+9P83cMBawyVNi4rJKSPYw7X8mQyzFQ=; b=fbFrlCPJkI5T8zkQEhHzWCOyw+bXWalaihEMf0zcwlZRSuikuqfJMXojkTETIauY+DnObAj1gh8BAEyoZPrsH5cgg635EdLXY7UbC6aUZY/UKYVzE6OoibCz2JqVhgVNEZ2A29g3gyQsvNPH/2pMybYePRZ4XGWl7zcLPbLp1tNqdadywgL5Onwjj7MPxP3dOvgS9fDcRHJir2LLpKIgobK9V9A3K6ruEa2cnSXo/zMYpK4KNCSg14P7JLSr2rT04v8Paj+bgNi92BDe0p9sYKoY8u0EzZgJGtZX+bHpZRa9VyI5RmDMdBkKK8aNaKXyS5KZ3EV4o5gICibyqqqXuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=pass header.d=amd.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-amdcloud-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=D0yShZZqS3ig+9P83cMBawyVNi4rJKSPYw7X8mQyzFQ=; b=3m4yPP/T8mXraoazfGk/AWgLJ6jzvzNIrtGAyX1PDnm+C1PJVjS5/T/av9oUPGj+nPZR3eHMLD3ThERBQ41aCSf8dR3q2BFkoKf7QjAcWz9lVToZsSH05amv3GfmmmypEF3as8ZzVL4oKTkaYKq+/rfPmXpZqTMpMo5iZIokZnc= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com; Received: from DM5PR12MB1386.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:77::9) by DM5PR12MB1898.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.16; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:47:41 +0000 Received: from DM5PR12MB1386.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::969:3d4e:6f37:c33c]) by DM5PR12MB1386.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::969:3d4e:6f37:c33c%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.017; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:47:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:47:34 +0000 From: Ashish Kalra To: Krish Sadhukhan Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, joro@8bytes.org, bp@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, srutherford@google.com, luto@kernel.org, brijesh.singh@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/14] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP ioctl Message-ID: <20200403204734.GA28542@ashkalra_ubuntu_server> References: <388afbf3af3a10cc3101008bc9381491cc7aab2f.1585548051.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> <88185cd3-a9f4-68a8-9c34-2e72deaf3d8d@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <88185cd3-a9f4-68a8-9c34-2e72deaf3d8d@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-ClientProxiedBy: SN4PR0201CA0034.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:2e::20) To DM5PR12MB1386.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:77::9) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from ashkalra_ubuntu_server (165.204.77.1) by SN4PR0201CA0034.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:2e::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:47:39 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [165.204.77.1] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 66e189d3-d36b-4ab9-f640-08d7d810402a X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM5PR12MB1898:|DM5PR12MB1898: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0362BF9FDB X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:DM5PR12MB1386.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFTY:;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(8676002)(33716001)(186003)(44832011)(53546011)(6916009)(6496006)(52116002)(33656002)(956004)(478600001)(6666004)(66556008)(66946007)(66476007)(7416002)(5660300002)(16526019)(316002)(1076003)(81156014)(4326008)(9686003)(86362001)(55016002)(26005)(2906002)(66574012)(8936002)(81166006);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: amd.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: hV4mKea96MliomVdi44AX8tvuxLeCrsDdyImWUiaWuHtx2KRR4k8g0OkGQW7arpXzye4E8tPonNO5qVfahggbBk0hHNP8/MESoXD7o5jZ2QvESquShNIHbpvnpvWlfbqWJHZbZFXJ8EzwJozafMhvoh7iyRJ5TvGh0gBp7aqStSzqjJn1P46W0NcJsqkr7fUJT87nOJxFKSJH9D9XB5k4De130mVdqwcFfKGWKEgiYgrC2H06+xXT+nfK3EXS+61yZFRKXttEOSVwNC3KTSlna4uru+017evQDean1jQO9PsX0RsSDuySVr23kCERCDkd/gF1JIt7I2o61KoIiG5d+19N8Y2B8K6ZT9JzU0I2zOQ798/ocFoAKrXdxMLMJ383fef0LQpOInFGQhoCrLNbJFphjx80AKkrBqgSCLD/vuYV2KXvMqWLzAC2QXAg6cZ X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 9LSCM7HGd+ZF5xGykhCB2vnnLkmSjba2+9Pk2xnUEQT2OsIbLFKQU/ZacJelmD6n68ijp1KeD+wjAcnUoK24Rwy1XnWsgDmu4roFLcAyKfD4NsMi8JvFBO5C4MXnHOXAJ33nKZz0UYcmgFjr+evG/g== X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66e189d3-d36b-4ab9-f640-08d7d810402a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2020 20:47:40.7426 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 41m3m83SPv3D487lmQnnXPDZes84+1u0PCDphT1pbUSTzhA0O5koAJPJ1nkes9NVH8/cg3BL3ts3FH75cbdy4A== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR12MB1898 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Krish Sadhukhan wrote: > > On 3/29/20 11:22 PM, Ashish Kalra wrote: > > From: Brijesh Singh > > > > The ioctl can be used to retrieve page encryption bitmap for a given > > gfn range. > > > > Return the correct bitmap as per the number of pages being requested > > by the user. Ensure that we only copy bmap->num_pages bytes in the > > userspace buffer, if bmap->num_pages is not byte aligned we read > > the trailing bits from the userspace and copy those bits as is. > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > > Cc: Ingo Molnar > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini > > Cc: "Radim Krčmář" > > Cc: Joerg Roedel > > Cc: Borislav Petkov > > Cc: Tom Lendacky > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra > > --- > > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 27 +++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 + > > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++++++ > > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 12 ++++++ > > 5 files changed, 124 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > index ebd383fba939..8ad800ebb54f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > @@ -4648,6 +4648,33 @@ This ioctl resets VCPU registers and control structures according to > > the clear cpu reset definition in the POP. However, the cpu is not put > > into ESA mode. This reset is a superset of the initial reset. > > +4.125 KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP (vm ioctl) > > +--------------------------------------- > > + > > +:Capability: basic > > +:Architectures: x86 > > +:Type: vm ioctl > > +:Parameters: struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap (in/out) > > +:Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error > > + > > +/* for KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP */ > > +struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap { > > + __u64 start_gfn; > > + __u64 num_pages; > > + union { > > + void __user *enc_bitmap; /* one bit per page */ > > + __u64 padding2; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > +The encrypted VMs have concept of private and shared pages. The private > > +page is encrypted with the guest-specific key, while shared page may > > +be encrypted with the hypervisor key. The KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP can > > +be used to get the bitmap indicating whether the guest page is private > > +or shared. The bitmap can be used during the guest migration, if the page > > +is private then userspace need to use SEV migration commands to transmit > > +the page. > > + > > 5. The kvm_run structure > > ======================== > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > index 90718fa3db47..27e43e3ec9d8 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -1269,6 +1269,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { > > int (*enable_direct_tlbflush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > int (*page_enc_status_hc)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, > > unsigned long sz, unsigned long mode); > > + int (*get_page_enc_bitmap)(struct kvm *kvm, > > + struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap *bmap); > > > Looking back at the previous patch, it seems that these two are basically > the setter/getter action for page encryption, though one is implemented as a > hypercall while the other as an ioctl. If we consider the setter/getter > aspect, isn't it better to have some sort of symmetry in the naming of the > ops ? For example, > >         set_page_enc_hc > >         get_page_enc_ioctl > > > }; These are named as per their usage. While the page_enc_status_hc is a hypercall used by a guest to mark the page encryption bitmap, the other ones are ioctl interfaces used by Qemu (or Qemu alternative) to get/set the page encryption bitmaps, so these are named accordingly. > > struct kvm_arch_async_pf { > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > > index 1d8beaf1bceb..bae783cd396a 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > > @@ -7686,6 +7686,76 @@ static int svm_page_enc_status_hc(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, > > return ret; > > } > > +static int svm_get_page_enc_bitmap(struct kvm *kvm, > > + struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap *bmap) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info; > > + unsigned long gfn_start, gfn_end; > > + unsigned long sz, i, sz_bytes; > > + unsigned long *bitmap; > > + int ret, n; > > + > > + if (!sev_guest(kvm)) > > + return -ENOTTY; > > + > > + gfn_start = bmap->start_gfn; > > > What if bmap->start_gfn is junk ? > > > + gfn_end = gfn_start + bmap->num_pages; > > + > > + sz = ALIGN(bmap->num_pages, BITS_PER_LONG) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > > + bitmap = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!bitmap) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + /* by default all pages are marked encrypted */ > > + memset(bitmap, 0xff, sz); > > + > > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > > + if (sev->page_enc_bmap) { > > + i = gfn_start; > > + for_each_clear_bit_from(i, sev->page_enc_bmap, > > + min(sev->page_enc_bmap_size, gfn_end)) > > + clear_bit(i - gfn_start, bitmap); > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > > + > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > + > > + n = bmap->num_pages % BITS_PER_BYTE; > > + sz_bytes = ALIGN(bmap->num_pages, BITS_PER_BYTE) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > > + > > + /* > > + * Return the correct bitmap as per the number of pages being > > + * requested by the user. Ensure that we only copy bmap->num_pages > > + * bytes in the userspace buffer, if bmap->num_pages is not byte > > + * aligned we read the trailing bits from the userspace and copy > > + * those bits as is. > > + */ > > + > > + if (n) { > > > Is it better to check for 'num_pages' at the beginning of the function > rather than coming this far if bmap->num_pages is zero ? > This is not checking for "num_pages", this is basically checking if bmap->num_pages is not byte aligned. > > + unsigned char *bitmap_kernel = (unsigned char *)bitmap; > > > Just trying to understand why you need this extra variable instead of using > 'bitmap' directly. > Makes the code much more readable/understandable. > > + unsigned char bitmap_user; > > + unsigned long offset, mask; > > + > > + offset = bmap->num_pages / BITS_PER_BYTE; > > + if (copy_from_user(&bitmap_user, bmap->enc_bitmap + offset, > > + sizeof(unsigned char))) > > + goto out; > > + > > + mask = GENMASK(n - 1, 0); > > + bitmap_user &= ~mask; > > + bitmap_kernel[offset] &= mask; > > + bitmap_kernel[offset] |= bitmap_user; > > + } > > + > > + if (copy_to_user(bmap->enc_bitmap, bitmap, sz_bytes)) > > > If 'n' is zero, we are still copying stuff back to the user. Is that what is > expected from userland ? > > Another point. Since copy_from_user() was done in the caller, isn't it > better to move this to the caller to keep a symmetry ? > As per the comments above, please note if n is not zero that means bmap->num_pages is not byte aligned so we read the trailing bits from the userspace and copy those bits as is. If n is zero, then bmap->num_pages is correctly aligned and we copy all the bytes back. Thanks, Ashish > > + goto out; > > + > > + ret = 0; > > +out: > > + kfree(bitmap); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > static int svm_mem_enc_op(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) > > { > > struct kvm_sev_cmd sev_cmd; > > @@ -8090,6 +8160,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = { > > .apic_init_signal_blocked = svm_apic_init_signal_blocked, > > .page_enc_status_hc = svm_page_enc_status_hc, > > + .get_page_enc_bitmap = svm_get_page_enc_bitmap, > > }; > > static int __init svm_init(void) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > index 68428eef2dde..3c3fea4e20b5 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -5226,6 +5226,18 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > > case KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER: > > r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(kvm, argp); > > break; > > + case KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP: { > > + struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap bitmap; > > + > > + r = -EFAULT; > > + if (copy_from_user(&bitmap, argp, sizeof(bitmap))) > > + goto out; > > + > > + r = -ENOTTY; > > + if (kvm_x86_ops->get_page_enc_bitmap) > > + r = kvm_x86_ops->get_page_enc_bitmap(kvm, &bitmap); > > + break; > > + } > > default: > > r = -ENOTTY; > > } > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > index 4e80c57a3182..db1ebf85e177 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > @@ -500,6 +500,16 @@ struct kvm_dirty_log { > > }; > > }; > > +/* for KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP */ > > +struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap { > > + __u64 start_gfn; > > + __u64 num_pages; > > + union { > > + void __user *enc_bitmap; /* one bit per page */ > > + __u64 padding2; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > /* for KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG */ > > struct kvm_clear_dirty_log { > > __u32 slot; > > @@ -1478,6 +1488,8 @@ struct kvm_enc_region { > > #define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET _IO(KVMIO, 0xc3) > > #define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET _IO(KVMIO, 0xc4) > > +#define KVM_GET_PAGE_ENC_BITMAP _IOW(KVMIO, 0xc5, struct kvm_page_enc_bitmap) > > + > > /* Secure Encrypted Virtualization command */ > > enum sev_cmd_id { > > /* Guest initialization commands */